FOUR-18107 - feature/FOUR-18103: Support for drafts (hidden variable in screen data) by CarliPinell · Pull Request #7336 · ProcessMaker/processmaker

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@CarliPinell

Copy link

Contributor

Solution

  • HasScreenFields trait was modified to show fields from new component CollectionRecordControl

Related Tickets & Packages

https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-18353

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.
    ci:next

@nolanpro nolanpro merged commit e940407 into feature/FOUR-18103

Sep 23, 2024

@nolanpro nolanpro deleted the feature/FOUR-18353 branch

September 23, 2024 22:18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@nolanpro nolanpro nolanpro approved these changes

@gproly gproly Awaiting requested review from gproly

@gustavobascope gustavobascope Awaiting requested review from gustavobascope

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CarliPinell @nolanpro