FOUR-20526 Define Swagger Schema for Server Service by caleeli · Pull Request #7773 · ProcessMaker/processmaker

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@caleeli

Copy link

Contributor

@caleeli caleeli commented

Nov 27, 2024

Define Swagger Schema for Server Service

How to Test

  • tests/Feature/Api/V1_1/ProcessVariableControllerTest.php
  • GET /api/1.1/processes/variables?processIds=1,2,3

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@caleeli

Copy link

Contributor Author

caleeli commented

Nov 28, 2024

ProcessVariablesMock.mov

@caleeli caleeli merged commit 712c7ed into epic/FOUR-20331

Nov 28, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rodriquelca rodriquelca rodriquelca approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@caleeli @rodriquelca