Fix: audit message being empty for attachment-only scam posts (#1300) by JankiGadhiya · Pull Request #1325 · Together-Java/TJ-Bot
Navigation Menu
{{ message }}
Together-Java / TJ-Bot Public
- Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
- Fork 108
Merged
Zabuzard merged 4 commits intoTogether-Java:developfrom
Sep 15, 2025Merged
Fix: audit message being empty for attachment-only scam posts (#1300)#1325
Zabuzard merged 4 commits intoTogether-Java:developfrom
Fix: audit message being empty for attachment-only scam posts (#1300)#1325
Zabuzard merged 4 commits intoTogether-Java:developfrom
Conversation
JankiGadhiya
requested a review
from a team
as a code owner
Copy link
All committers have signed the CLA.
Zabuzard
assigned
JankiGadhiya
Copy link
Member
Zabuzard
commented
Sep 15, 2025
Zabuzard commented
Sep 15, 2025Looks good so far :) Id like to see a screenshot of it in Discord, maybe we want a few minor tweaks on the text then.
Ill check it out locally and do the local testing myself if you have not setup your testing-bot yet 👍
Copy link
Member
Zabuzard
commented
Sep 15, 2025
Zabuzard commented
Sep 15, 2025license/cla was signed (probably with wrong account but its fine)
Zabuzard added 2 commits
September 15, 2025 08:52
Copy link
Member
Zabuzard
commented
Sep 15, 2025
Zabuzard commented
Sep 15, 2025I did some smaller improvements to the code while doing the local testing right away:
gradle:spotlessApplyto get rid of formatting issues- replaced text building by
"...".formatted(...), more readable - changed the text from
and x attachments: (...)to(The message has x attachments: ...)
Copy link
Member
Zabuzard
commented
Sep 15, 2025
Zabuzard commented
Sep 15, 2025Local testing:
No text
No attachments
Both
Zabuzard approved these changes Sep 15, 2025
Zabuzard
mentioned this pull request
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment