Fix inconsistent handling of Firestore Project and Database ID by pacoavila808 · Pull Request #36895 · apache/beam
Summary of Changes
Hello @pacoavila808, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses an inconsistency in how Firestore Project and Database IDs are handled within the Beam SDK. The changes introduce a more robust and explicit mechanism for resolving these IDs when creating Firestore stubs and making API requests. This ensures that the correct project and database are consistently targeted, improving reliability and configurability, particularly in testing environments.
Highlights
- Refactored FirestoreStub Creation: Introduced an overloaded
getFirestoreStubmethod inFirestoreStatefulComponentFactorythat accepts explicitconfiguredProjectIdandconfiguredDatabaseIdparameters, allowing for more precise control over the target Firestore instance. - Enhanced Project and Database ID Resolution: The logic for constructing the
x-goog-request-paramsheader has been improved to prioritize explicitly provided project and database IDs, falling back toFirestoreOptionsand thenGcpOptionsfor the project ID, ensuring consistent and predictable ID usage. - Explicit ID Usage in FirestoreV1WriteFn: The
FirestoreV1WriteFnnow utilizes the newgetFirestoreStubmethod, passing the resolved project and database IDs directly, which aligns its behavior with the updated ID resolution mechanism. - Updated Firestore Testing Helper: The
FirestoreTestingHelperhas been modified to accept an explicit database ID during its instantiation, enabling more flexible and accurate testing scenarios that reflect the new ID handling logic.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩