Introduce more abstract handling of throttling signaling by jrmccluskey · Pull Request #35984 · apache/beam
Summary of Changes
Hello @jrmccluskey, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors the handling of throttling signaling within Apache Beam's Python SDK. It introduces a new ThrottlingSignaler class to abstract the mechanism for communicating throttling events to the SDK worker and a ReactiveThrottler class that wraps the existing AdaptiveThrottler to streamline logging and signaling. The RemoteModelHandler is updated to leverage this new ReactiveThrottler, simplifying its internal throttling logic.
Highlights
- Abstracted Throttling Signaling: A new ThrottlingSignaler class is introduced to provide a more abstract way to signal throttling duration to the SDK worker, using a cumulative metric. This design allows for future changes to the signaling mechanism without impacting callers.
- Encapsulated Reactive Throttling: A ReactiveThrottler class, inheriting from AdaptiveThrottler, is added. This new class centralizes the logic for logging throttling events and signaling them via the ThrottlingSignaler, making the throttling implementation more self-contained.
- Simplified RemoteModelHandler Throttling: The RemoteModelHandler's run_inference method is simplified by delegating the entire throttling loop, including logging and metric updates, to the new ReactiveThrottler's throttle() method. This reduces boilerplate and improves readability in RemoteModelHandler.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩