Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:

• Your pull request should address just one issue, without pulling in other changes.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
  Note that commits might be squashed by a maintainer on merge.
• Write unit tests that match behavioral changes, where the tests fail if the changes to the runtime are not applied.
  This may not always be possible but is a best-practice.
• Run mvn verify to make sure basic checks pass.
  A more thorough check will be performed on your pull request automatically.
• You have run the integration tests successfully (mvn -Prun-its verify).

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.

• I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
• In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

For me also the names and artifactIds are confusing. Should IMHO contain "http". Otherwise it is hard to separate from transport-file (which is jdk/jre only as well). Also not sure about JDK vs JRE. For me this should be rather the latter as this is no feature exclusive to the JDK, so I would propose artifactId maven-resolver-transporter-http-java and name Maven Artifact Resolver Transporter HTTP with Java Client. @cstamas WDYT?

Also transport vs transporter is not quite clear. For me the SPI name is transporter, so should be impls of that SPI. Transport for me rather refers to the scheme/protocol.

We followed the module naming from old Resolver 1.x and I did not want to change them (the GAVs). For naming in POM, I agree but don't find it relevant. Finally, we have 4 transports capable of HTTP, so this will make really long (and hard to distinguish) module names like resolver-transport-http-java?

Any concerns with just changing the descriptions for now (i.e. merge the PR as is)?