fix: Add equality check to UserData model by janbuchar · Pull Request #562 · apify/crawlee-python

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@janbuchar

Copy link

Collaborator

This is needed for Apify SDK tests

@janbuchar janbuchar added t-tooling

Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

adhoc

Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint.

labels

Oct 2, 2024

@janbuchar janbuchar requested a review from vdusek

October 2, 2024 14:20

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 99th sprint - Tooling team milestone

Oct 2, 2024
Copy link

Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Pull Request Tookit has failed!

If issue is not linked to the pull request then estimate the pull request!

Copy link

Collaborator

@vdusek vdusek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@janbuchar janbuchar merged commit 899a25c into master

Oct 2, 2024

@janbuchar janbuchar deleted the user-data-equality-check branch

October 2, 2024 15:15

janbuchar added a commit to apify/apify-sdk-python that referenced this pull request

Oct 2, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@github-actions github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] left review comments

@vdusek vdusek vdusek approved these changes

Assignees

@janbuchar janbuchar

Labels

adhoc

Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint.

t-tooling

Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

99th sprint - Tooling team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@janbuchar @vdusek