fix: Properly unwrap driver instance if the ContextAware object is deeply nested by mykola-mokhnach · Pull Request #2052 · appium/java-client

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@mykola-mokhnach

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

Change list

Related to #2051

Types of changes

  • No changes in production code.
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach changed the title fix: Properly unwrap driver instance if the ContextAware object is deeply nested WIP: fix: Properly unwrap driver instance if the ContextAware object is deeply nested

Oct 20, 2023

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach changed the title WIP: fix: Properly unwrap driver instance if the ContextAware object is deeply nested fix: Properly unwrap driver instance if the ContextAware object is deeply nested

Oct 20, 2023

@mykola-mokhnach

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

Failed android tests are expected because the CI fails to start emulator. The fix itself works properly though

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach merged commit fac489f into appium:master

Oct 22, 2023

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach deleted the wraps_check branch

October 22, 2023 17:29

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SrinivasanTarget SrinivasanTarget SrinivasanTarget approved these changes

@saikrishna321 saikrishna321 Awaiting requested review from saikrishna321 saikrishna321 is a code owner

@valfirst valfirst Awaiting requested review from valfirst valfirst is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mykola-mokhnach @SrinivasanTarget