Introduce official clang-format by lpranam · Pull Request #596 · boostorg/gil

@lpranam

mloskot

@mloskot mloskot changed the title introduce official clang-format Introduce official clang-format

Apr 12, 2021

mloskot added a commit to mloskot/gil that referenced this pull request

Apr 25, 2021
- Trailing return types everywhere
- Optionally, return type deduction where sensible (simple and short functions)

This is related to introduction of common .clang-format,
see boostorg#596 (comment)

mloskot added a commit to mloskot/gil that referenced this pull request

Apr 26, 2021
- Trailing return types everywhere
- Optionally, return type deduction where sensible (simple and short functions)

This is related to introduction of common .clang-format,
see boostorg#596 (comment)

lpranam

mloskot added a commit to mloskot/gil that referenced this pull request

May 6, 2021
- Trailing return types everywhere
- Optionally, return type deduction where sensible (simple and short functions)

This is related to introduction of common .clang-format,
see boostorg#596 (comment)

mloskot added a commit to mloskot/gil that referenced this pull request

May 6, 2021
- Trailing return types everywhere
- Optionally, return type deduction where sensible (simple and short functions)

This is related to introduction of common .clang-format,
see boostorg#596 (comment)

@mloskot

This is intermediate commit to clearly show the .clang-format tweaks
that I'd like to propose to @lpranam 's original.

harshitpant1 added a commit to harshitpant1/gil that referenced this pull request

Jun 23, 2021
Uses the clang-format configuration provided in the latest commit of PR boostorg#596. Formatting is applied to test file and example file as well. I have made no changes whatsoever after using the clang-format.

mloskot added a commit that referenced this pull request

Jun 27, 2022
- Trailing return types everywhere
- Optionally, return type deduction where sensible (simple and short functions)

This is related to introduction of common .clang-format,
see #596 (comment)