Don't use deprecated form of user-defined literal operator by Thomas-Barbier-1A · Pull Request #663

Don't use deprecated form of user-defined literal operator by Thomas-Barbier-1A · Pull Request #663 · boostorg/multiprecision

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

Thomas-Barbier-1A commented
Mar 17, 2025

No description provided.

Don't use deprecated form of user-defined literal operator

ade2b95

Thomas-Barbier-1A force-pushed the fix_deprecated_form_of_user_defined_literal_operator branch from ced03ef to ade2b95 Compare

March 17, 2025 16:41

Copy link Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented
Mar 17, 2025
•

edited

Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.1%. Comparing base (49ef290) to head (ade2b95).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #663     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     94.1%   94.1%   -0.0%     
=========================================
  Files          279     279             
  Lines        28979   28979             
=========================================
- Hits         27255   27253      -2     
- Misses        1724    1726      +2

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
include/boost/multiprecision/cpp_int/literals.hpp	`100.0% <ø> (ø)`

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 49ef290...ade2b95. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow: