Provides a CachingOuptutStream and a CachingWriter by gnodet · Pull Request #184 · codehaus-plexus/plexus-utils

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@gnodet

Copy link

Member Author

gnodet commented

Apr 26, 2022

@olamy @michael-o @cstamas could one of you squash/merge this PR ? I don't have any karma to do it.

@michael-o

Copy link

Member

@olamy @michael-o @cstamas could one of you squash/merge this PR ? I don't have any karma to do it.

Interactive rebase does not work for you in the terminal?

@gnodet

Copy link

Member Author

gnodet commented

Apr 26, 2022

@olamy @michael-o @cstamas could one of you squash/merge this PR ? I don't have any karma to do it.

Interactive rebase does not work for you in the terminal?

I suppose it does, however, I can't push to the codehaus-plexus repositories as I'm not a member of this org. So it's more about the merge part than the squash ;-)

@cstamas cstamas merged commit 49773f1 into codehaus-plexus:master

Apr 26, 2022

@cstamas

Copy link

Member

cstamas commented

Apr 26, 2022

@gnodet seems merged code UT failed?

@gnodet

Copy link

Member Author

gnodet commented

Apr 26, 2022

Weird, that's the one I fixed with 0c03b46

@gnodet

Copy link

Member Author

gnodet commented

Apr 26, 2022

So the test is flaky under linux. I'll provide a PR to make it more robust or fix the problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cstamas cstamas cstamas approved these changes

@olamy olamy Awaiting requested review from olamy

+1 more reviewer

@sonatype-lift sonatype-lift[bot] sonatype-lift[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gnodet @michael-o @cstamas @olamy