Lua Tools for BCC
This directory contains Lua tooling for BCC (the BPF Compiler Collection).
BCC is a toolkit for creating userspace and kernel tracing programs. By
default, it comes with a library libbcc, some example tooling and a Python
frontend for the library.
Here we present an alternate frontend for libbcc implemented in LuaJIT. This
lets you write the userspace part of your tracer in Lua instead of Python.
Since LuaJIT is a JIT compiled language, tracers implemented in bcc-lua
exhibit significantly reduced overhead compared to their Python equivalents.
This is particularly noticeable in tracers that actively use the table APIs to
get information from the kernel.
If your tracer makes extensive use of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY or
BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, you may find the performance characteristics of this
implementation very appealing, as LuaJIT can compile to native code a lot of
the callchain to process the events, and this wrapper has been designed to
benefit from such JIT compilation.
Quickstart Guide
The following instructions assume Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
-
Clone this repository
$ git clone https://github.com/iovisor/bcc.git $ cd bcc/ -
As per the Ubuntu - Binary installation istructions, install the required upstream stable and signed packages
$ sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 4052245BD4284CDD $ echo "deb https://repo.iovisor.org/apt/$(lsb_release -cs) $(lsb_release -cs) main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/iovisor.list $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install bcc-tools libbcc-examples linux-headers-$(uname -r) -
Install LuaJit and the corresponding development files
$ sudo apt-get install luajit luajit-5.1-dev -
Test one of the examples to ensure
libbccis properly installed$ sudo src/lua/bcc-probe examples/lua/task_switch.lua
LuaJIT BPF compiler
Now it is also possible to write Lua functions and compile them transparently to BPF bytecode, here is a simple socket filter example:
local S = require('syscall') local bpf = require('bpf') local map = bpf.map('array', 256) -- Kernel-space part of the program local prog = assert(bpf(function () local proto = pkt.ip.proto -- Get byte (ip.proto) from frame at [23] xadd(map[proto], 1) -- Increment packet count end)) -- User-space part of the program local sock = assert(bpf.socket('lo', prog)) for i=1,10 do local icmp, udp, tcp = map[1], map[17], map[6] print('TCP', tcp, 'UDP', udp, 'ICMP', icmp, 'packets') S.sleep(1) end
The other application of BPF programs is attaching to probes for perf event tracing. That means you can trace events inside the kernel (or user-space), and then collect results - for example histogram of sendto() latency, off-cpu time stack traces, syscall latency, and so on. While kernel probes and perf events have unstable ABI, with a dynamic language we can create and use proper type based on the tracepoint ABI on runtime.
Runtime automatically recognizes reads that needs a helper to be accessed. The type casts denote source of the objects, for example the bashreadline example that prints entered bash commands from all running shells:
local ffi = require('ffi') local bpf = require('bpf') -- Perf event map local sample_t = 'struct { uint64_t pid; char str[80]; }' local events = bpf.map('perf_event_array') -- Kernel-space part of the program bpf.uprobe('/bin/bash:readline' function (ptregs) local sample = ffi.new(sample_t) sample.pid = pid_tgid() ffi.copy(sample.str, ffi.cast('char *', req.ax)) -- Cast `ax` to string pointer and copy to buffer perf_submit(events, sample) -- Write sample to perf event map end, true, -1, 0) -- User-space part of the program local log = events:reader(nil, 0, sample_t) -- Must specify PID or CPU_ID to observe while true do log:block() -- Wait until event reader is readable for _,e in log:read() do -- Collect available reader events print(tonumber(e.pid), ffi.string(e.str)) end end
Where cast to struct pt_regs flags the source of data as probe arguments, which means any pointer derived
from this structure points to kernel and a helper is needed to access it. Casting req.ax to pointer is then required for ffi.copy semantics, otherwise it would be treated as u64 and only it's value would be
copied. The type detection is automatic most of the times (socket filters and bpf.tracepoint), but not with uprobes and kprobes.
Installation
Examples
See examples/lua directory.
Helpers
print(...)is a wrapper forbpf_trace_printk, the output is captured incat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipebit.*library is supported (lshift, rshift, arshift, bnot, band, bor, bxor)math.*library partially supported (log2, log, log10)ffi.cast()is implemented (including structures and arrays)ffi.new(...)allocates memory on stack, initializers are NYIffi.copy(...)copies memory (possibly using helpers) between stack/kernel/registersntoh(x[, width])- convert from network to host byte order.hton(x[, width])- convert from host to network byte order.xadd(dst, inc)- exclusive add, a synchronous*dst += bif Lua had+=operator
Below is a list of BPF-specific helpers:
time()- return current monotonic time in nanoseconds (usesbpf_ktime_get_ns)cpu()- return current CPU number (usesbpf_get_smp_processor_id)pid_tgid()- return callertgid << 32 | pid(usesbpf_get_current_pid_tgid)uid_gid()- return callergid << 32 | uid(usesbpf_get_current_uid_gid)comm(var)- write current process name (usesbpf_get_current_comm)perf_submit(map, var)- submit variable to perf event array BPF mapstack_id(map, flags)- return stack trace identifier from stack trace BPF mapload_bytes(off, var)- helper for direct packet access withskb_load_bytes()
Current state
- Not all LuaJIT bytecode opcodes are supported (notable mentions below)
- Closures
UCLOwill probably never be supported, although you can use upvalues inside compiled function. - Type narrowing is opportunistic. Numbers are 64-bit by default, but 64-bit immediate loads are not supported (e.g.
local x = map[ffi.cast('uint64_t', 1000)]) - Tail calls
CALLT, and iteratorsITERIare NYI (as of now) - Arbitrary ctype is supported both for map keys and values
- Basic optimisations like: constant propagation, partial DCE, liveness analysis and speculative register allocation are implement, but there's no control flow analysis yet. This means the compiler has the visibility when things are used and dead-stores occur, but there's no rewriter pass to eliminate them.
- No register sub-allocations, no aggressive use of caller-saved
R1-5, no aggressive narrowing (this would require variable range assertions and variable relationships) - Slices with not 1/2/4/8 length are NYI (requires allocating a memory on stack and using pointer type)