Home Original page

Add a bunch more detail to --device-metadata output, from fields we weren't formerly using in the output. by ianmcorvidae · Pull Request #865 · meshtastic/python

@ianmcorvidae

Copy link

Contributor

No description provided. 

…eren't formerly using in the output.

@codecov

Copy link

codecov bot commented

Nov 20, 2025

•

edited

Loading

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 21.42857% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.88%. Comparing base (1088cc6) to head (2a44be9).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
meshtastic/node.py 29.41% 12 Missing ⚠️
meshtastic/util.py 9.09% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #865      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.14%   59.88%   -0.27%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        4291     4318      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits         2581     2586       +5     
- Misses       1710     1732      +22
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 59.88% <21.42%> (-0.27%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ianmcorvidae ianmcorvidae merged commit 1a50377 into meshtastic:master

Nov 20, 2025

9 of 11 checks passed

@ianmcorvidae ianmcorvidae deleted the device-metadata-details branch

November 20, 2025 21:29