[intelrdfpmathlib] Install CMake config files, more headers, test port by ajtribick · Pull Request #50083 · microsoft/vcpkg

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Comments

Conversation

@ajtribick

Copy link

Contributor

@ajtribick ajtribick commented

Feb 19, 2026

edited

Loading

  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide.
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download.
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version.
  • Any fixed CI baseline entries are removed from that file.
  • Any patches that are no longer applied are deleted from the port's directory.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Only one version is added to each modified port's versions file.
  • Add an unofficial CMake target to make it easier to link this.
  • Install the bid_conf.h and bid_functions.h headers (matches the headers installed by the Ubuntu package)
  • Create a test port

@ajtribick ajtribick closed this

Feb 19, 2026

@ajtribick ajtribick deleted the intelrdfpmathlib-target branch

February 19, 2026 20:19

@ajtribick ajtribick restored the intelrdfpmathlib-target branch

February 20, 2026 20:16

@ajtribick ajtribick reopened this

Feb 20, 2026

@ajtribick

Copy link

Contributor Author

Ok now I need to patch the definition of fexcept_t? Was this even building on Android previously?

@ajtribick ajtribick force-pushed the intelrdfpmathlib-target branch from e849dda to 03538f5 Compare

February 20, 2026 22:50

@ajtribick ajtribick force-pushed the intelrdfpmathlib-target branch from 5c31658 to 967e1c6 Compare

February 20, 2026 23:03

@ajtribick ajtribick marked this pull request as ready for review

February 20, 2026 23:21

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@dg0yt dg0yt dg0yt left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ajtribick @dg0yt