fs: partition readFile to avoid threadpool exhaustion by davisjam · Pull Request #17054 · nodejs/node

@nodejs-github-bot added the fs

Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.

label

Nov 15, 2017

@benjamingr benjamingr changed the title Partition readFile to avoid threadpool exhaustion fs: partition readFile to avoid threadpool exhaustion

Nov 16, 2017

mscdex

mscdex

mscdex

BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request

Feb 1, 2018
Problem:

Node implements fs.readFile as:
- a call to stat, then
- a C++ -> libuv request to read the entire file using the stat size

Why is this bad?
The effect is to place on the libuv threadpool a potentially-large
read request, occupying the libuv thread until it completes.
While readFile certainly requires buffering the entire file contents,
it can partition the read into smaller buffers
(as is done on other read paths)
along the way to avoid threadpool exhaustion.

If the file is relatively large or stored on a slow medium, reading
the entire file in one shot seems particularly harmful,
and presents a possible DoS vector.

Solution:

Partition the read into multiple smaller requests.

Considerations:

1. Correctness

I don't think partitioning the read like this raises
any additional risk of read-write races on the FS.
If the application is concurrently readFile'ing and modifying the file,
it will already see funny behavior. Though libuv uses preadv where
available, this doesn't guarantee read atomicity in the presence of
concurrent writes.

2. Performance

Downside: Partitioning means that a single large readFile will
  require into many "out and back" requests to libuv,
  introducing overhead.
Upside: In between each "out and back", other work pending on the
  threadpool can take a turn.

In short, although partitioning will slow down a large request,
it will lead to better throughput if the threadpool is handling
more than one type of request.

Fixes: nodejs#17047

PR-URL: nodejs#17054
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Feb 11, 2018
PR-URL: #17610
Refs: #17054 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Feb 12, 2018
PR-URL: #17610
Refs: #17054 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Feb 13, 2018
PR-URL: #17610
Refs: #17054 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request

May 8, 2018
Problem:

Node implements fs.readFile as:
- a call to stat, then
- a C++ -> libuv request to read the entire file using the stat size

Why is this bad?
The effect is to place on the libuv threadpool a potentially-large
read request, occupying the libuv thread until it completes.
While readFile certainly requires buffering the entire file contents,
it can partition the read into smaller buffers
(as is done on other read paths)
along the way to avoid threadpool exhaustion.

If the file is relatively large or stored on a slow medium, reading
the entire file in one shot seems particularly harmful,
and presents a possible DoS vector.

Solution:

Partition the read into multiple smaller requests.

Considerations:

1. Correctness

I don't think partitioning the read like this raises
any additional risk of read-write races on the FS.
If the application is concurrently readFile'ing and modifying the file,
it will already see funny behavior. Though libuv uses preadv where
available, this doesn't guarantee read atomicity in the presence of
concurrent writes.

2. Performance

Downside: Partitioning means that a single large readFile will
  require into many "out and back" requests to libuv,
  introducing overhead.
Upside: In between each "out and back", other work pending on the
  threadpool can take a turn.

In short, although partitioning will slow down a large request,
it will lead to better throughput if the threadpool is handling
more than one type of request.

Fixes: nodejs#17047

PR-URL: nodejs#17054
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

@Trott Trott mentioned this pull request

Jan 27, 2019