src: add check against non-weak BaseObjects at process exit by addaleax · Pull Request #35490 · nodejs/node
When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up
without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on
the heap should be:
1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer
referenced, or
2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer
referenced, or
3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop
alive, or
4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here)
There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally,
if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap
that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking
at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing
`MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object.
In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list
of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so
when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode
(where --verify-base-objects is always-on).
In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues
that were fixed in the PRs referenced below.
Refs: nodejs#35488
Refs: nodejs#35487
Refs: nodejs#35481
added
lib / src
labels
Oct 3, 2020
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
label
Oct 3, 2020
addaleax
added
author ready
and removed blocked
PRs that are blocked by other issues or PRs.labels
Oct 6, 2020
addaleax
deleted the
no-forgotten-make-weak
branch
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request
Oct 7, 2020When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up
without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on
the heap should be:
1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer
referenced, or
2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer
referenced, or
3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop
alive, or
4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here)
There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally,
if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap
that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking
at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing
`MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object.
In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list
of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so
when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode
(where --verify-base-objects is always-on).
In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues
that were fixed in the PRs referenced below.
Refs: #35488
Refs: #35487
Refs: #35481
PR-URL: #35490
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
joesepi pushed a commit to joesepi/node that referenced this pull request
Jan 8, 2021When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up
without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on
the heap should be:
1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer
referenced, or
2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer
referenced, or
3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop
alive, or
4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here)
There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally,
if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap
that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking
at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing
`MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object.
In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list
of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so
when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode
(where --verify-base-objects is always-on).
In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues
that were fixed in the PRs referenced below.
Refs: nodejs#35488
Refs: nodejs#35487
Refs: nodejs#35481
PR-URL: nodejs#35490
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request
May 23, 2021When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up
without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on
the heap should be:
1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer
referenced, or
2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer
referenced, or
3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop
alive, or
4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here)
There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally,
if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap
that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking
at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing
`MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object.
In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list
of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so
when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode
(where --verify-base-objects is always-on).
In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues
that were fixed in the PRs referenced below.
Refs: nodejs#35488
Refs: nodejs#35487
Refs: nodejs#35481
PR-URL: nodejs#35490
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
May 25, 2021When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up
without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on
the heap should be:
1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer
referenced, or
2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer
referenced, or
3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop
alive, or
4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here)
There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally,
if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap
that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking
at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing
`MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object.
In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list
of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so
when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode
(where --verify-base-objects is always-on).
In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues
that were fixed in the PRs referenced below.
Refs: #35488
Refs: #35487
Refs: #35481
PR-URL: #35490
Backport-PR-URL: #38786
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Jun 11, 2021When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up
without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on
the heap should be:
1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer
referenced, or
2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer
referenced, or
3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop
alive, or
4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here)
There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally,
if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap
that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking
at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing
`MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object.
In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list
of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so
when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode
(where --verify-base-objects is always-on).
In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues
that were fixed in the PRs referenced below.
Refs: #35488
Refs: #35487
Refs: #35481
PR-URL: #35490
Backport-PR-URL: #38786
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters