test: use --port=0 in most sequential debugger tests and move them to parallel by joyeecheung · Pull Request #47274 · nodejs/node

@nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci

PRs that need a full CI run.

test

Issues and PRs related to the tests.

labels

Mar 27, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

@aduh95 aduh95 added the author ready

PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.

label

Apr 1, 2023

joyeecheung added a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 4, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

joyeecheung added a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 4, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 5, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 5, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 5, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 5, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 6, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 6, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 7, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 7, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 8, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 8, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 13, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 13, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Jul 6, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Jul 6, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: #47274
Refs: #47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this pull request

Jul 6, 2023
To avoid failures when there is another running process occupying
the port 9229 which may happen if there is a stale process, use the
--port argument of node-inspect to use a random port in tests that
don't have to work on port 9229.

The following tests are not touched:

- test-debugger-custom-port: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-debug-brk: tests a specific port
- test-debugger-invalid-args: tests other inspect combinations
- test-debugger-pid: node-inspect does not support -p and --port
  together
- test-debugger-launch: tests that default port is 9229

PR-URL: nodejs#47274
Refs: nodejs#47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this pull request

Jul 6, 2023
Before

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:25|% 100|+  32|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+   6|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

After

```
❯ tools/test.py "sequential/test-debugger*"
[00:06|% 100|+   5|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
❯ tools/test.py -J "parallel/test-debugger*"
[00:05|% 100|+  33|-   0]: Done

All tests passed.
```

PR-URL: nodejs#47274
Refs: nodejs#47146
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

ckerr added a commit to electron/electron that referenced this pull request

Jul 19, 2023
Xref: nodejs/node#47274

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

some tests moved from sequential to parallel

ckerr added a commit to electron/electron that referenced this pull request

Jul 25, 2023
Xref: nodejs/node#47274

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

some tests moved from sequential to parallel

ckerr added a commit to electron/electron that referenced this pull request

Aug 7, 2023
Xref: nodejs/node#47274

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

some tests moved from sequential to parallel

ckerr added a commit to electron/electron that referenced this pull request

Aug 8, 2023
* chore: bump node in DEPS to v18.17.0

* chore: update build_modify_js2c_py_to_allow_injection_of_original-fs_and_custom_embedder_js.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#46930

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: update build_ensure_native_module_compilation_fails_if_not_using_a_new.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#48248

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: update fix_expose_the_built-in_electron_module_via_the_esm_loader.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47824

chore: upstream func throwIfUnsupportedURLProtocol() has been removed, so no need to patch it

* chore: update api_pass_oomdetails_to_oomerrorcallback.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47695

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: remove fix_prevent_changing_functiontemplateinfo_after_publish.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#46979 (upstreamed patch)

Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2718147 (related)

* chore: update fix_adapt_debugger_tests_for_upstream_v8_changes.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47274

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

some tests moved from sequential to parallel

* chore: remove fix_libc_buffer_overflow_in_string_view_ctor.patch

Xref: fix_libc_buffer_overflow_in_string_view_ctor.patch

patch is no longer needed due to upstream bump to ada 2.2.0

* chore: remove fix_preventing_potential_oob_in_ada_no_scheme_parsing.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47339

patch is no longer needed due to upstream bump to ada 2.2.0

* chore: rebuild filenames.json

several files removed/added/changed upstream

* chore: update build_add_gn_build_files.patch

upstream dep histogram 0.11.7 moved its include path from src/ to include/

Xref: nodejs/node#47742

* chore: update fix_crypto_tests_to_run_with_bssl.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47160

BoringSSL doesn't support BIO_s_secmem() (a secure heap variant of
BIO_s_mem()), so use BIO_s_mem() instead.

Related discussion of secure heap support in BoringSSL:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54309

* fix: ftbfs in node dep ada

* fix: ftbfs in node dep uvwasi

* chore: rebuild patches

* chore: update fix_handle_boringssl_and_openssl_incompatibilities.patch

Upstream used `BIO_s_secmem()`, a secure heap variant of `BIO_s_mem()`.
BoringSSL doesn't support it, so this PR opts for `BIO_s_mem()` instead.

Upstream Node.js change that prompted this:
nodejs/node#47160

Related discussion of BoringSSL support of secure heap:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54309

* fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

* chore: sort script/node-disabled-tests.json alphabetically

* test: add parallel/test-snapshot-argv1 to disabled list

test: add parallel/test-snapshot-namespaced-builtin to disabled list

We don't support that type of snapshotting at the moment.

* chore: disable flaky node test parallel/test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error

fails upstream in v18.x on my box as well

* ci: ensure spawned node tests have ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE set

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

fix: infinite loop regression

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

* chore: patch fixtures/errors/force_colors.snapshot

The line numbers in the stacktrace from our v8 build don't match what
Node's tests are expecting, so update the stacktrace to match our build.

The specific numbers probably aren't t needed for the force_colors test,
which is trying to see whether or not the lines are greyed out. One option
is to upstream a test change to stop hardcoding the stacktrace.

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

fix; pull in upstream bugfix

* fixup! ci: ensure spawned node tests have ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE set

chore: do not inject ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE in test-assert-colors.js

* chore: disable flaky node test parallel/test-debugger-random-port-with-inspect-port

---------

Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Kerr <charles@charleskerr.com>

win32ss pushed a commit to win32ss/supermium-electron that referenced this pull request

Sep 24, 2023
* chore: bump node in DEPS to v18.17.0

* chore: update build_modify_js2c_py_to_allow_injection_of_original-fs_and_custom_embedder_js.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#46930

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: update build_ensure_native_module_compilation_fails_if_not_using_a_new.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#48248

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: update fix_expose_the_built-in_electron_module_via_the_esm_loader.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47824

chore: upstream func throwIfUnsupportedURLProtocol() has been removed, so no need to patch it

* chore: update api_pass_oomdetails_to_oomerrorcallback.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47695

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: remove fix_prevent_changing_functiontemplateinfo_after_publish.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#46979 (upstreamed patch)

Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2718147 (related)

* chore: update fix_adapt_debugger_tests_for_upstream_v8_changes.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47274

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

some tests moved from sequential to parallel

* chore: remove fix_libc_buffer_overflow_in_string_view_ctor.patch

Xref: fix_libc_buffer_overflow_in_string_view_ctor.patch

patch is no longer needed due to upstream bump to ada 2.2.0

* chore: remove fix_preventing_potential_oob_in_ada_no_scheme_parsing.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47339

patch is no longer needed due to upstream bump to ada 2.2.0

* chore: rebuild filenames.json

several files removed/added/changed upstream

* chore: update build_add_gn_build_files.patch

upstream dep histogram 0.11.7 moved its include path from src/ to include/

Xref: nodejs/node#47742

* chore: update fix_crypto_tests_to_run_with_bssl.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47160

BoringSSL doesn't support BIO_s_secmem() (a secure heap variant of
BIO_s_mem()), so use BIO_s_mem() instead.

Related discussion of secure heap support in BoringSSL:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54309

* fix: ftbfs in node dep ada

* fix: ftbfs in node dep uvwasi

* chore: rebuild patches

* chore: update fix_handle_boringssl_and_openssl_incompatibilities.patch

Upstream used `BIO_s_secmem()`, a secure heap variant of `BIO_s_mem()`.
BoringSSL doesn't support it, so this PR opts for `BIO_s_mem()` instead.

Upstream Node.js change that prompted this:
nodejs/node#47160

Related discussion of BoringSSL support of secure heap:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54309

* fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

* chore: sort script/node-disabled-tests.json alphabetically

* test: add parallel/test-snapshot-argv1 to disabled list

test: add parallel/test-snapshot-namespaced-builtin to disabled list

We don't support that type of snapshotting at the moment.

* chore: disable flaky node test parallel/test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error

fails upstream in v18.x on my box as well

* ci: ensure spawned node tests have ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE set

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

fix: infinite loop regression

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

* chore: patch fixtures/errors/force_colors.snapshot

The line numbers in the stacktrace from our v8 build don't match what
Node's tests are expecting, so update the stacktrace to match our build.

The specific numbers probably aren't t needed for the force_colors test,
which is trying to see whether or not the lines are greyed out. One option
is to upstream a test change to stop hardcoding the stacktrace.

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

fix; pull in upstream bugfix

* fixup! ci: ensure spawned node tests have ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE set

chore: do not inject ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE in test-assert-colors.js

* chore: disable flaky node test parallel/test-debugger-random-port-with-inspect-port

---------

Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Kerr <charles@charleskerr.com>

MrHuangJser pushed a commit to MrHuangJser/electron that referenced this pull request

Dec 11, 2023
* chore: bump node in DEPS to v18.17.0

* chore: update build_modify_js2c_py_to_allow_injection_of_original-fs_and_custom_embedder_js.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#46930

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: update build_ensure_native_module_compilation_fails_if_not_using_a_new.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#48248

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: update fix_expose_the_built-in_electron_module_via_the_esm_loader.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47824

chore: upstream func throwIfUnsupportedURLProtocol() has been removed, so no need to patch it

* chore: update api_pass_oomdetails_to_oomerrorcallback.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47695

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

* chore: remove fix_prevent_changing_functiontemplateinfo_after_publish.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#46979 (upstreamed patch)

Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2718147 (related)

* chore: update fix_adapt_debugger_tests_for_upstream_v8_changes.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47274

manually sync patch to minor upstream code shear

some tests moved from sequential to parallel

* chore: remove fix_libc_buffer_overflow_in_string_view_ctor.patch

Xref: fix_libc_buffer_overflow_in_string_view_ctor.patch

patch is no longer needed due to upstream bump to ada 2.2.0

* chore: remove fix_preventing_potential_oob_in_ada_no_scheme_parsing.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47339

patch is no longer needed due to upstream bump to ada 2.2.0

* chore: rebuild filenames.json

several files removed/added/changed upstream

* chore: update build_add_gn_build_files.patch

upstream dep histogram 0.11.7 moved its include path from src/ to include/

Xref: nodejs/node#47742

* chore: update fix_crypto_tests_to_run_with_bssl.patch

Xref: nodejs/node#47160

BoringSSL doesn't support BIO_s_secmem() (a secure heap variant of
BIO_s_mem()), so use BIO_s_mem() instead.

Related discussion of secure heap support in BoringSSL:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54309

* fix: ftbfs in node dep ada

* fix: ftbfs in node dep uvwasi

* chore: rebuild patches

* chore: update fix_handle_boringssl_and_openssl_incompatibilities.patch

Upstream used `BIO_s_secmem()`, a secure heap variant of `BIO_s_mem()`.
BoringSSL doesn't support it, so this PR opts for `BIO_s_mem()` instead.

Upstream Node.js change that prompted this:
nodejs/node#47160

Related discussion of BoringSSL support of secure heap:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54309

* fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

* chore: sort script/node-disabled-tests.json alphabetically

* test: add parallel/test-snapshot-argv1 to disabled list

test: add parallel/test-snapshot-namespaced-builtin to disabled list

We don't support that type of snapshotting at the moment.

* chore: disable flaky node test parallel/test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error

fails upstream in v18.x on my box as well

* ci: ensure spawned node tests have ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE set

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

fix: infinite loop regression

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

* chore: patch fixtures/errors/force_colors.snapshot

The line numbers in the stacktrace from our v8 build don't match what
Node's tests are expecting, so update the stacktrace to match our build.

The specific numbers probably aren't t needed for the force_colors test,
which is trying to see whether or not the lines are greyed out. One option
is to upstream a test change to stop hardcoding the stacktrace.

* fixup! fix: work around Node 18 isURL() regression

fix; pull in upstream bugfix

* fixup! ci: ensure spawned node tests have ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE set

chore: do not inject ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE in test-assert-colors.js

* chore: disable flaky node test parallel/test-debugger-random-port-with-inspect-port

---------

Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Kerr <charles@charleskerr.com>