Home Original page

punycode: update to v1.3.2 by mathiasbynens · Pull Request #6 · nodejs/node

@mathiasbynens 

Changes since v1.2.3:

* Email address support in `toASCII` and `toUnicode`
* `punycode.ucs2.encode` now no longer mutates the `codePoints`
  argument
* Ensure trailing `.` in domain names are preserved
* Some minor code cleanup + bug fixes

pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Nov 28, 2014 
Changes since v1.2.3:

* Email address support in `toASCII` and `toUnicode`
* `punycode.ucs2.encode` now no longer mutates the `codePoints`
  argument
* Ensure trailing `.` in domain names are preserved
* Some minor code cleanup + bug fixes

Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor@indutny.com>
PR-URL: #6

@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request

Jan 3, 2015

@mhhf mhhf mentioned this pull request

Aug 24, 2016

minervapanda pushed a commit to minervapanda/node that referenced this pull request

Oct 9, 2016

thlorenz referenced this pull request in thlorenz/node

Nov 21, 2016

jasongin pushed a commit to jasongin/nodejs that referenced this pull request

Dec 8, 2016

@sxa sxa mentioned this pull request

Mar 16, 2017

targos referenced this pull request in targos/node

Apr 17, 2021 
Original commit message:

    Merged: [wasm-simd][x64] Check for register when emitting shuffles

    Some shuffles take have either register or memory operand for second
    input, but the codegen incorrectly assumes that it is always a register.

    Bug: v8:10824
    (cherry picked from commit ddf30bea13902829eeb71aa0ec747155e27e5a68)

    Change-Id: I897c4290a8b91ff2ab839e98b16a9696c0bae511
    No-Try: true
    No-Presubmit: true
    No-Tree-Checks: true
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391280
    Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/8.6@{#6}
    Cr-Branched-From: a64aed2333abf49e494d2a5ce24bbd14fff19f60-refs/heads/8.6.395@{#1}
    Cr-Branched-From: a626bc036236c9bf92ac7b87dc40c9e538b087e3-refs/heads/master@{#69472}

Refs: v8/v8@516b5d3

targos referenced this pull request in targos/node

Apr 27, 2021 
Original commit message:

    Merged: [wasm-simd][x64] Check for register when emitting shuffles

    Some shuffles take have either register or memory operand for second
    input, but the codegen incorrectly assumes that it is always a register.

    Bug: v8:10824
    (cherry picked from commit ddf30bea13902829eeb71aa0ec747155e27e5a68)

    Change-Id: I897c4290a8b91ff2ab839e98b16a9696c0bae511
    No-Try: true
    No-Presubmit: true
    No-Tree-Checks: true
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391280
    Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/8.6@{#6}
    Cr-Branched-From: a64aed2333abf49e494d2a5ce24bbd14fff19f60-refs/heads/8.6.395@{#1}
    Cr-Branched-From: a626bc036236c9bf92ac7b87dc40c9e538b087e3-refs/heads/master@{#69472}

Refs: v8/v8@516b5d3

targos added a commit that referenced this pull request

Apr 30, 2021 
Original commit message:

    Merged: [wasm-simd][x64] Check for register when emitting shuffles

    Some shuffles take have either register or memory operand for second
    input, but the codegen incorrectly assumes that it is always a register.

    Bug: v8:10824
    (cherry picked from commit ddf30bea13902829eeb71aa0ec747155e27e5a68)

    Change-Id: I897c4290a8b91ff2ab839e98b16a9696c0bae511
    No-Try: true
    No-Presubmit: true
    No-Tree-Checks: true
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391280
    Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/8.6@{#6}
    Cr-Branched-From: a64aed2333abf49e494d2a5ce24bbd14fff19f60-refs/heads/8.6.395@{#1}
    Cr-Branched-From: a626bc036236c9bf92ac7b87dc40c9e538b087e3-refs/heads/master@{#69472}

Refs: v8/v8@516b5d3

PR-URL: #38275
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>