Home Original page

buffer: hard-deprecate calling Buffer without new by seishun · Pull Request #8169 · nodejs/node

@seishun

@nodejs-github-bot added the buffer

Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem.

label

Aug 18, 2016

@addaleax addaleax added the semver-major

PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version.

label

Aug 18, 2016

This was referenced

Aug 18, 2016

@seishun

@seishun

@seishun

addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request

Nov 9, 2016 
This reverts commit f2fe558
(nodejs#8169) as the original
justification for the runtime-deprecation does not appear
to justify the disruption to Node’s existing ecosystem.
Futhermore, the possibility of deprecating the Buffer constructor
entirely in v8.0 might lead to people having to change their code twice.

evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Nov 28, 2016 
This reverts commit f2fe558
(#8169) as the original
justification for the runtime-deprecation does not appear
to justify the disruption to Node’s existing ecosystem.
Futhermore, the possibility of deprecating the Buffer constructor
entirely in v8.0 might lead to people having to change their code twice.

PR-URL: #9529
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Nikolai Vavilov <vvnicholas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>

addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request

Dec 5, 2016 
This reverts commit f2fe558
(#8169) as the original
justification for the runtime-deprecation does not appear
to justify the disruption to Node’s existing ecosystem.
Futhermore, the possibility of deprecating the Buffer constructor
entirely in v8.0 might lead to people having to change their code twice.

PR-URL: #9529
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Nikolai Vavilov <vvnicholas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>