`test-regress-nodejsGH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

`test-regress-nodejsGH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

PR-URL: nodejs#9487
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>

`test-regress-GH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

PR-URL: #9487
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>

`test-regress-nodejsGH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

PR-URL: nodejs#9487
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>

`test-regress-GH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

PR-URL: #9487
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>

`test-regress-GH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

PR-URL: #9487
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>

`test-regress-GH-897` is dependent on a timer firing within a period of
time. Especially on some of the FreeBSD hosts on CI, we have seen tests
like that fail when run in parallel. (This may have nothing to do with
FreeBSD and may just mean that the hosts are resource-constrained.) Move
this test to sequential as we have done with several other
timer-dependent tests recently.

The test has also been refactored and documented via comments.

PR-URL: #9487
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com>

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-nodejsGH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

Fixes: nodejs#10073

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-nodejsGH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: nodejs#10903
Fixes: nodejs#10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-nodejsGH-897.

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-nodejsGH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: nodejs#10903
Fixes: nodejs#10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-GH-897.

PR-URL: #10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-nodejsGH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: nodejs#10903
Fixes: nodejs#10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-GH-897.

PR-URL: #10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-nodejsGH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: nodejs#10903
Fixes: nodejs#10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-nodejsGH-897.

PR-URL: nodejs#10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-nodejsGH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: nodejs#10903
Fixes: nodejs#10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-nodejsGH-897.

PR-URL: nodejs#10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-GH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: #10903
Fixes: #10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-GH-897.

PR-URL: #10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-GH-897.

PR-URL: #10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

Even after being moved to `sequential` in
1ce05ad, `test-regress-GH-897` still
was occasionally flaky on Raspberry Pi devices on CI.

The test is especially sensitive to resource constraints. It failed
reliably on my laptop if I moved it to `parallel` and ran 32 competing
node test processes. Even for a flaky test, that's unusually low. I
typically don't see problems, even for flaky tests, until I get up to
around four times that number.

On a Raspberry Pi, of course, that sensitivity to resource constraints
will manifest much sooner.

This change checks the order of timers firing, rather than the duration
before a timer is fired. This eliminates the sensitivity to resource
constraints. The test can now be moved back to `parallel`. I am able to
run many copies of the test simultaneously without seeing test failures.

PR-URL: #10903
Fixes: #10073
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-GH-897.

PR-URL: #10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

In test-timers, confirm that all input values that should be coerced to
1 ms are not being coerced to a significantly larger value.

This eliminates the need for the separate test-regress-GH-897.

PR-URL: #10960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>