tools: release signing improvements by rvagg · Pull Request #9071 · nodejs/node

added 2 commits

October 13, 2016 13:08

This was referenced

Oct 13, 2016

MylesBorins

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 18, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 18, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

@rvagg rvagg deleted the release-signing branch

October 19, 2016 03:05

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 19, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 26, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 26, 2016
PR-URL: #9071
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>

@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request

Jan 5, 2017

rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Sep 13, 2017
It is more secure to verify SHASUMS256.txt files via SHASUMS256.txt.sig
than SHASUMS256.txt.asc.

This comment does the best job at explaining the issue:
  #6821 (comment)

Refer: #6821
Refer: #9071
PR-URL: #15107
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Sep 20, 2017
It is more secure to verify SHASUMS256.txt files via SHASUMS256.txt.sig
than SHASUMS256.txt.asc.

This comment does the best job at explaining the issue:
  #6821 (comment)

Refer: #6821
Refer: #9071
PR-URL: #15107
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 17, 2017
It is more secure to verify SHASUMS256.txt files via SHASUMS256.txt.sig
than SHASUMS256.txt.asc.

This comment does the best job at explaining the issue:
  #6821 (comment)

Refer: #6821
Refer: #9071
PR-URL: #15107
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Oct 25, 2017
It is more secure to verify SHASUMS256.txt files via SHASUMS256.txt.sig
than SHASUMS256.txt.asc.

This comment does the best job at explaining the issue:
  #6821 (comment)

Refer: #6821
Refer: #9071
PR-URL: #15107
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>