🌱 Makefile: add test-upgrade-experimental-e2e by joelanford · Pull Request #2151 · operator-framework/operator-controller

Conversation

@joelanford

Description

Adds a make task and github workflow for running upgrade tests against the experimental e2e release. The intent is for this to be an "informing" job pre-merge, not a blocking job.

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@netlify

tmshort

CATALOGS_MANIFEST := ./manifests/default-catalogs.yaml

# Manifest used by kind-deploy, which may be overridden by other targets
SOURCE_MANIFEST := $(STANDARD_MANIFEST)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this is likely breaking things in multiple places (there are a number of failures)

tmshort

$(CONTAINER_RUNTIME) save $(CATD_IMG) | $(KIND) load image-archive /dev/stdin --name $(KIND_CLUSTER_NAME)

.PHONY: kind-deploy
kind-deploy: export MANIFEST := $(STANDARD_RELEASE_MANIFEST)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deleting this causes two issues:

  1. You are redirecting into nothing on L331
  2. The envsubst command doesn't have a value on L333

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does not appear to be carried over from setting it in test-upgrade-e2e, etc.

@tmshort

Yeah, the "experimental-e2e" is using the standard manifest... which is plainly wrong...

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>

@codecov

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.73%. Comparing base (0e0e706) to head (1e615d8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2151      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.79%   72.73%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines        7340     7340              
==========================================
- Hits         5343     5339       -4     
- Misses       1651     1654       +3     
- Partials      346      347       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 44.38% <ø> (ø)
experimental-e2e 55.00% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unit 58.22% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joelanford

Ok, I think I have it fixed up. Will double check that the correct manifests are being used for each job...

@joelanford

@tmshort

@openshift-ci

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved

Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

label

Aug 15, 2025

Labels

approved

Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

lgtm

Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

2 participants

@joelanford @tmshort