bpo-33319: Clarify subprocess call docs. by gpshead · Pull Request #12508 · python/cpython
gpshead
deleted the
subprocess-docs-33319
branch
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
Mar 23, 2019Clarify capturing or suppressing stdout and stderr on the old call APIs. Do not state that they are equivalent to run() calls when they are not implemented using run as that was misleading. Unlike run they cannot handle stdout or stderr being set to PIPE without a risk of deadlock. (cherry picked from commit 7a2e84c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request
Mar 23, 2019Clarify capturing or suppressing stdout and stderr on the old call APIs. Do not state that they are equivalent to run() calls when they are not implemented using run as that was misleading. Unlike run they cannot handle stdout or stderr being set to PIPE without a risk of deadlock. (cherry picked from commit 7a2e84c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters