[3.7] bpo-26903: Limit ProcessPoolExecutor to 61 workers on Windows (GH-13132) by miss-islington · Pull Request #13206 · python/cpython
Navigation Menu
{{ message }}
- Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
- Fork 34.4k
Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit intopython:3.7from
Closed
[3.7] bpo-26903: Limit ProcessPoolExecutor to 61 workers on Windows (GH-13132)#13206
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit intopython:3.7from
[3.7] bpo-26903: Limit ProcessPoolExecutor to 61 workers on Windows (GH-13132)#13206
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit intopython:3.7from
Conversation
Copy link Copy Markdown
Contributor
Co-Authored-By: brianquinlan brian@sweetapp.com
(cherry picked from commit 3988986)
Co-authored-by: Brian Quinlan brian@sweetapp.com
the-knights-who-say-ni
added
the
CLA signed
label
bedevere-bot
mentioned this pull request
bedevere-bot
added
the
awaiting review
label
zooba approved these changes May 8, 2019
bedevere-bot
added
awaiting merge
and removed
awaiting review
labels
Copy link Copy Markdown
Contributor Author
miss-islington
commented
May 8, 2019
miss-islington commented
May 8, 2019@brianquinlan and @zooba: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .
2 similar comments
Copy link Copy Markdown
Contributor Author
miss-islington
commented
May 8, 2019
miss-islington commented
May 8, 2019@brianquinlan and @zooba: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .
Copy link Copy Markdown
Contributor Author
miss-islington
commented
May 8, 2019
miss-islington commented
May 8, 2019@brianquinlan and @zooba: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .
Copy link Copy Markdown
Member
ned-deily
commented
May 29, 2019
ned-deily commented
May 29, 2019(Recreating backport to force retesting.)
ned-deily
closed this
miss-islington
deleted the
backport-3988986-3.7
branch
diogocp
mannequin
mentioned this pull request
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment