bpo-37213: Handle negative line deltas correctly in the peephole optimizer by pablogsal · Pull Request #13969 · python/cpython

@pablogsal

@pablogsal

vstinner

@pablogsal

vstinner

vstinner

serhiy-storchaka

@pablogsal @serhiy-storchaka

Co-Authored-By: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>

@pablogsal

@pablogsal

vstinner

@pablogsal

@pablogsal

serhiy-storchaka

@pablogsal

serhiy-storchaka

@pablogsal

serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka

@pablogsal

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request

Jun 13, 2019
…mizer (GH-13969)

The peephole optimizer was not optimizing correctly bytecode after negative deltas were introduced. This is due to the fact that some special values (255) were being searched for in both instruction pointer delta and line number deltas.
(cherry picked from commit 3498c64)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>

lisroach pushed a commit to lisroach/cpython that referenced this pull request

Sep 10, 2019
…mizer (pythonGH-13969)

The peephole optimizer was not optimizing correctly bytecode after negative deltas were introduced. This is due to the fact that some special values (255) were being searched for in both instruction pointer delta and line number deltas.

DinoV pushed a commit to DinoV/cpython that referenced this pull request

Jan 14, 2020
…mizer (pythonGH-13969)

The peephole optimizer was not optimizing correctly bytecode after negative deltas were introduced. This is due to the fact that some special values (255) were being searched for in both instruction pointer delta and line number deltas.