bpo-38644: Make tstate more explicit inside pystate.c by vstinner · Pull Request #19182 · python/cpython
Navigation Menu
{{ message }}
- Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
- Fork 34.2k
Merged
bpo-38644: Make tstate more explicit inside pystate.c#19182
vstinner merged 4 commits intopython:masterfrom
vstinner:pystate_tstate
bpo-38644: Make tstate more explicit inside pystate.c#19182
vstinner merged 4 commits intopython:masterfrom
vstinner:pystate_tstate
Conversation
Copy link
Member
Fix PyInterpreterState_New(): Don't call PyErr_SetString() when there
is no current Python thread state (if tstate is NULL).
Fix PyInterpreterState_New(): Don't call PyErr_SetString() when there is no current Python thread state (if tstate is NULL).
the-knights-who-say-ni
added
the
CLA signed
label
vstinner
added
the
skip news
label
bedevere-bot
added
the
awaiting core review
label
vstinner added 3 commits
March 26, 2020 19:27
vstinner
merged commit
71a3522
into
python:master
bedevere-bot
removed
the
awaiting core review
label
vstinner
deleted the
pystate_tstate
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment