Home Original page

[3.8] bpo-36769: Document that fnmatch.filter supports any kind of iterable (GH-13039) by miss-islington · Pull Request #23846 · python/cpython

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented

Dec 18, 2020

•

edited

Loading

(cherry picked from commit e8d2264)

Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino adelfino@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue36769

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:JulienPalard

…pythonGH-13039)

(cherry picked from commit e8d2264)

Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

@andresdelfino

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

@JulienPalard is there a way to rerun the tests?

@andresdelfino

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

@JulienPalard is there a way to rerun the tests? I would normally just push an empty commit, but don't know if that affects the backporting.

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-e8d2264-3.8 branch

January 20, 2021 10:22

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

1 similar comment

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

@JulienPalard

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

Damned, I tried closing/reopening to restart the failed job, but @miss-islington removed the branch :D

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @JulienPalard: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@JulienPalard JulienPalard JulienPalard approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting merge docs

Documentation in the Doc dir

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@miss-islington @andresdelfino @JulienPalard @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot