[3.10] bpo-36700: [doc] Update base64 RFC references to RFC 4648 (GH-27700) by miss-islington · Pull Request #27759 · python/cpython

Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ===============================================================
.. module:: base64 :synopsis: RFC 3548: Base16, Base32, Base64 Data Encodings; :synopsis: RFC 4648: Base16, Base32, Base64 Data Encodings; Base85 and Ascii85
**Source code:** :source:`Lib/base64.py` Expand All @@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ This module provides functions for encoding binary data to printable ASCII characters and decoding such encodings back to binary data. It provides encoding and decoding functions for the encodings specified in :rfc:`3548`, which defines the Base16, Base32, and Base64 algorithms, :rfc:`4648`, which defines the Base16, Base32, and Base64 algorithms, and for the de-facto standard Ascii85 and Base85 encodings.
The :rfc:`3548` encodings are suitable for encoding binary data so that it can The :rfc:`4648` encodings are suitable for encoding binary data so that it can be safely sent by email, used as parts of URLs, or included as part of an HTTP POST request. The encoding algorithm is not the same as the :program:`uuencode` program. Expand All @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ There are two interfaces provided by this module. The modern interface supports encoding :term:`bytes-like objects <bytes-like object>` to ASCII :class:`bytes`, and decoding :term:`bytes-like objects <bytes-like object>` or strings containing ASCII to :class:`bytes`. Both base-64 alphabets defined in :rfc:`3548` (normal, and URL- and filesystem-safe) are supported. defined in :rfc:`4648` (normal, and URL- and filesystem-safe) are supported.
The legacy interface does not support decoding from strings, but it does provide functions for encoding and decoding to and from :term:`file objects Expand Down Expand Up @@ -287,6 +287,13 @@ An example usage of the module: >>> data b'data to be encoded'
.. _base64-security:
Security Considerations -----------------------
A new security considerations section was added to :rfc:`4648` (section 12); it's recommended to review the security section for any code deployed to production.
.. seealso::
Expand Down