bpo-27923: Minor API improvements for binary sequences (PEP 467) by elias6 · Pull Request #3237 · python/cpython

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@elias6

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

@elias6 elias6 commented

Aug 29, 2017

edited by bedevere-bot

Loading

This is basically my original attempt to implement PEP 467, with some minor changes to make it work with Python 3.7.

https://bugs.python.org/issue27923

@mscuthbert

Copy link Copy Markdown

Do we generally put in a PendingDeprecationWarning when the alternative syntax is not available in still supported versions of Python or is going all the way to DeprecationWarning immediately the normal way of doing things? The new syntax is great, but I'd prefer not to need to do a version test/fork as long as <= Py3.6 is still supported by my modules and while PendingDeprecationWarnings are fine, I try not to have DeprecationWarnings in code I release.

@elias6

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

elias6 commented

Jan 5, 2018

So... what else needs to be done for this change to be approved? Does someone need to merge it?

@methane methane added DO-NOT-MERGE type-feature

A feature request or enhancement

and removed awaiting review labels

Nov 22, 2019

@github-actions

Copy link Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale

Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

label

Feb 21, 2022

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland added the pending

The issue will be closed if no feedback is provided

label

Jul 24, 2022

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale

Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

label

Jul 29, 2022

@github-actions

Copy link Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale

Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

label

Aug 30, 2022

@erlend-aasland

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

Closing this, as the linked issue has been closed.

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland removed the pending

The issue will be closed if no feedback is provided

label

Sep 6, 2022

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

DO-NOT-MERGE stale

Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

type-feature

A feature request or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@elias6 @mscuthbert @erlend-aasland @methane @the-knights-who-say-ni @ezio-melotti @bedevere-bot