bpo-11063: Use more reliable way to detect if it exists by berkerpeksag · Pull Request #4343 · python/cpython
Navigation Menu
{{ message }}
- Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
- Fork 34.2k
Merged
berkerpeksag merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
Nov 8, 2017Merged
bpo-11063: Use more reliable way to detect if it exists#4343
berkerpeksag merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
bpo-11063: Use more reliable way to detect if it exists#4343
berkerpeksag merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
Copy link
Member
the-knights-who-say-ni
added
the
CLA signed
label
bedevere-bot
added
the
awaiting merge
label
berkerpeksag
added
the
skip news
label
berkerpeksag
requested a review
from serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka approved these changes Nov 8, 2017
Copy link
Member
serhiy-storchaka
left a comment
serhiy-storchaka
left a comment
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems this check works. But I'm not an autoconf expert and I don't know whether there is more idiomatic way to check the existence of a function.
berkerpeksag
merged commit
0e163d2
into
python:master
bedevere-bot
removed
the
awaiting merge
label
berkerpeksag
deleted the
11063-tweak
branch
terryjreedy added a commit that referenced this pull request
Jan 26, 2021This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment