bpo-29463: Add docstring field to some AST nodes. by methane · Pull Request #46 · python/cpython

@methane

ClassDef, ModuleDef, FunctionDef, and AsyncFunctionDef has docstring
field for now.  It was first statement of there body.

@methane

vstinner

@methane

@myint myint mentioned this pull request

May 14, 2017

@myint myint mentioned this pull request

May 28, 2017

tacaswell added a commit to tacaswell/sphinx-gallery that referenced this pull request

Jul 9, 2017
python/cpython#46 or bpo-29463

added docstring as a property to the module class that comes out of
AST (so the free strings no longer appear an the first element in the
parsed files).

tacaswell added a commit to tacaswell/sphinx-gallery that referenced this pull request

Aug 5, 2017
python/cpython#46 or bpo-29463

added docstring as a property to the module class that comes out of
AST (so the free strings no longer appear an the first element in the
parsed files).

tacaswell added a commit to tacaswell/jedi that referenced this pull request

Oct 23, 2017

davidhalter pushed a commit to davidhalter/jedi that referenced this pull request

Nov 6, 2017
* FIX: install on python 3.7

python/cpython#46 /
https://bugs.python.org/issue29463 move the module comment into the
AST node and hence out of the tree which means the 2nd entry in the
tree is now the import rather than the `__version__` string.

Adds nightly on travis.

* BLD: update python tags in setup.py

* CI: switch to 3.7-dev

* CI: allow failure on 3.7 dev

iritkatriel referenced this pull request in iritkatriel/cpython

Jul 22, 2021

jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request

Dec 2, 2022
* Pin pytest to latest version 3.3.2

* Pin pytest-asyncio to latest version 0.8.0

* Pin pytest-aiohttp to latest version 0.3.0

* Update cherry_picker from 0.2.5 to 0.2.7

* Pin aiohttp to latest version 2.3.9

* Pin gidgethub to latest version 2.4.1

* Pin cachetools to latest version 2.0.1

* Pin requests to latest version 2.18.4

* Pin redis to latest version 2.10.6

* Pin celery to latest version 4.1.0

* Comment out python 3.7 from travis CI

jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request

Feb 17, 2023

jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request

Feb 17, 2023
Update pyproject.toml and setup.py

Closes python#46

See merge request python-devs/importlib_resources!47

isidentical referenced this pull request in isidentical/cpython

Mar 25, 2023
…sprint

test: Fix fstring related tests in test_tokenize.py

oraluben pushed a commit to oraluben/cpython that referenced this pull request

Jun 26, 2023
Co-authored-by: Ken Jin <kenjin4096@gmail.com>

medmunds added a commit to medmunds/cpython that referenced this pull request

Aug 1, 2024
Email generators had been incorrectly flattening non-ASCII email
addresses to RFC 2047 encoded-word format, leaving them undeliverable.
(RFC 2047 prohibits use of encoded-word in an addr-spec.)
This change raises a ValueError when attempting to flatten an
EmailMessage with a non-ASCII addr-spec and a policy with utf8=False.
(Exception: If the non-ASCII address originated from parsing a message,
it will be flattened as originally parsed, without error.)

Non-ASCII email addresses are supported when using a policy with
utf8=True (such as email.policy.SMTPUTF8) under RFCs 6531 and 6532.

Non-ASCII email address domains (but not localparts) can also be used
with non-SMTPUTF8 policies by encoding the domain as an IDNA A-label.
(The email package does not perform this encoding, because it cannot
know whether the caller wants IDNA 2003, IDNA 2008, or some other
variant such as UTS python#46.)

medmunds added a commit to medmunds/cpython that referenced this pull request

Aug 1, 2024
Email generators had been incorrectly flattening non-ASCII email
addresses to RFC 2047 encoded-word format, leaving them undeliverable.
(RFC 2047 prohibits use of encoded-word in an addr-spec.)
This change raises a ValueError when attempting to flatten an
EmailMessage with a non-ASCII addr-spec and a policy with utf8=False.
(Exception: If the non-ASCII address originated from parsing a message,
it will be flattened as originally parsed, without error.)

Non-ASCII email addresses are supported when using a policy with
utf8=True (such as email.policy.SMTPUTF8) under RFCs 6531 and 6532.

Non-ASCII email address domains (but not localparts) can also be used
with non-SMTPUTF8 policies by encoding the domain as an IDNA A-label.
(The email package does not perform this encoding, because it cannot
know whether the caller wants IDNA 2003, IDNA 2008, or some other
variant such as UTS python#46.)

medmunds added a commit to medmunds/cpython that referenced this pull request

Aug 1, 2024
Email generators had been incorrectly flattening non-ASCII email
addresses to RFC 2047 encoded-word format, leaving them undeliverable.
(RFC 2047 prohibits use of encoded-word in an addr-spec.)
This change raises a ValueError when attempting to flatten an
EmailMessage with a non-ASCII addr-spec and a policy with utf8=False.
(Exception: If the non-ASCII address originated from parsing a message,
it will be flattened as originally parsed, without error.)

Non-ASCII email addresses are supported when using a policy with
utf8=True (such as email.policy.SMTPUTF8) under RFCs 6531 and 6532.

Non-ASCII email address domains (but not localparts) can also be used
with non-SMTPUTF8 policies by encoding the domain as an IDNA A-label.
(The email package does not perform this encoding, because it cannot
know whether the caller wants IDNA 2003, IDNA 2008, or some other
variant such as UTS python#46.)

medmunds added a commit to medmunds/cpython that referenced this pull request

Aug 1, 2024
Email generators had been incorrectly flattening non-ASCII email
addresses to RFC 2047 encoded-word format, leaving them undeliverable.
(RFC 2047 prohibits use of encoded-word in an addr-spec.)
This change raises a ValueError when attempting to flatten an
EmailMessage with a non-ASCII addr-spec and a policy with utf8=False.
(Exception: If the non-ASCII address originated from parsing a message,
it will be flattened as originally parsed, without error.)

Non-ASCII email addresses are supported when using a policy with
utf8=True (such as email.policy.SMTPUTF8) under RFCs 6531 and 6532.

Non-ASCII email address domains (but not localparts) can also be used
with non-SMTPUTF8 policies by encoding the domain as an IDNA A-label.
(The email package does not perform this encoding, because it cannot
know whether the caller wants IDNA 2003, IDNA 2008, or some other
variant such as UTS python#46.)

medmunds added a commit to medmunds/cpython that referenced this pull request

Aug 1, 2024
Email generators had been incorrectly flattening non-ASCII email
addresses to RFC 2047 encoded-word format, leaving them undeliverable.
(RFC 2047 prohibits use of encoded-word in an addr-spec.)
This change raises a ValueError when attempting to flatten an
EmailMessage with a non-ASCII addr-spec and a policy with utf8=False.
(Exception: If the non-ASCII address originated from parsing a message,
it will be flattened as originally parsed, without error.)

Non-ASCII email addresses are supported when using a policy with
utf8=True (such as email.policy.SMTPUTF8) under RFCs 6531 and 6532.

Non-ASCII email address domains (but not localparts) can also be used
with non-SMTPUTF8 policies by encoding the domain as an IDNA A-label.
(The email package does not perform this encoding, because it cannot
know whether the caller wants IDNA 2003, IDNA 2008, or some other
variant such as UTS python#46.)

This was referenced

Feb 11, 2025