bpo-34123: Fix missed documentation update for dict.popitem(). by rhettinger · Pull Request #8292 · python/cpython
Navigation Menu
{{ message }}
- Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
- Fork 34.4k
Merged
rhettinger merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
Jul 17, 2018Merged
bpo-34123: Fix missed documentation update for dict.popitem().#8292
rhettinger merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
bpo-34123: Fix missed documentation update for dict.popitem().#8292
rhettinger merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
Copy link Copy Markdown
Contributor
rhettinger
added
docs
skip news needs backport to 3.7 labels
Jul 16, 2018
the-knights-who-say-ni
added
the
CLA signed
label
bedevere-bot
added
the
awaiting merge
label
tim-one reviewed Jul 16, 2018
Copy link Copy Markdown
Member
tim-one
left a comment
tim-one
left a comment
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Just wondering whether it would be helpful to add a "version changed in" blurb too so readers know that relying on LIFO creates a version dependence.
rhettinger
merged commit
01b7d58
into
python:master
Copy link Copy Markdown
Contributor
miss-islington
commented
Jul 17, 2018
miss-islington commented
Jul 17, 2018Thanks @rhettinger for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖
bedevere-bot
removed
the
awaiting merge
label
Copy link Copy Markdown
bedevere-bot
commented
Jul 17, 2018
bedevere-bot commented
Jul 17, 2018GH-8307 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.
bedevere-bot
removed
the
needs backport to 3.7
label
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
Jul 17, 2018rhettinger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Jul 17, 2018
rhettinger
deleted the
dict-lifo-popitem
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment