feat: use `ValueStringBuilder` adding the query parameters by TimothyMakkison · Pull Request #1719 · reactiveui/refit
Uses ValueStringBuilder to generate query parameters for the uri and prepend a question mark.
Update: turns out UriBuilder has been changed between .NET Framework and Core. Core checks for leading ? symbols whereas Framework always adds one. I've added a preprocessor directive to resovle this issue.
Original
| Method | Mean | Error | StdDev | Gen0 | Gen1 | Allocated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TaskTQueryLong_Async | 12.97 us | 0.258 us | 0.665 us | 1.5717 | 0.0458 | 14.45 KB |
| TaskTCollectionQuery_Async | 18.64 us | 0.372 us | 0.848 us | 1.8921 | 0.0610 | 17.4 KB |
Changes
| Method | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Gen0 | Gen1 | Allocated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TaskTQueryLong_Async | 12.81 us | 0.278 us | 0.712 us | 12.60 us | 1.5259 | - | 14.15 KB |
| TaskTCollectionQuery_Async | 18.21 us | 0.325 us | 0.348 us | 18.24 us | 1.8311 | 0.0305 | 16.85 KB |
@TimothyMakkison there's a merge conflict, is it possible for you to solve this? I am in Dubai at the moment and the connection is very poor, once the conflict is solved, I will try to review this PR.
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 32.84672% with 92 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 84.69%. Comparing base (
6ebeda5) to head (5428291).
Report is 41 commits behind head on main.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| Refit/ValueStringBuilder.cs | 23.96% | 88 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️ |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1719 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 87.73% 84.69% -3.04% ========================================== Files 33 35 +2 Lines 2348 2483 +135 Branches 294 317 +23 ========================================== + Hits 2060 2103 +43 - Misses 208 300 +92 Partials 80 80
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@TimothyMakkison there's a merge conflict, is it possible for you to solve this? I am in Dubai at the moment and the connection is very poor, once the conflict is solved
Should be up to date now and I've made a couple of readability improvements.
I will try to review this PR.
I'm in no rush to have this merged, please don't take time out of your holiday for this 😄
I see that #1389 is closed, as a maintainer do you think my proposal would be accepted? I'm pretty confident I can prevent any breaking changes while drastically improving startup times, but I'm not sure if the core team is interested. Otherwise I can continue improving the current library.
I'm working here in Dubai unfortunately, but just until the end of this month, I still get to benefit from the good weather 🙂, I will make time over the weekend to go through a few things. I have made a release, hopefully nothing bad happened with it, I have seen one element that needs updating to resolve, but a fairly simple temporary fix for the user.
I need to create a good service and client combination to use as a live test, as not everything is tested and some things seem untestable due to the nature of the code.
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
github-actions
bot
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters