coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops by Zalathar · Pull Request #124508 · rust-lang/rust

@Zalathar

Instead of separately hard-coding the operation being visited, we can get it
from the match arm pattern by using an as-pattern.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

Apr 29, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Apr 29, 2024

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

Apr 29, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124269 (Pretty-print parenthesis around binary in postfix match)
 - rust-lang#124415 (Use probes more aggressively in new solver)
 - rust-lang#124475 (Remove direct dependencies on lazy_static, once_cell and byteorder)
 - rust-lang#124484 (Fix rust-lang#124478 - offset_of! returns a temporary)
 - rust-lang#124504 (Mark unions non-const-propagatable in `KnownPanicsLint` without calling layout)
 - rust-lang#124508 (coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops)
 - rust-lang#124522 ([Refactor] Rename `Lint` and `LintGroup`'s `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded` )

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

Apr 29, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124508 - Zalathar:op, r=jieyouxu

coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops

This is a tiny little thing that I noticed during the final review of rust-lang#123409, and I didn't want to hold up the whole PR just for this.

Instead of separately hard-coding the operation being visited, we can get it from the match arm pattern by using an as-pattern.

`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage