Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics by fmease · Pull Request #125210 · rust-lang/rust

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

May 17, 2024

@fmease fmease added the C-cleanup

Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup.

label

May 17, 2024

davidtwco

@fmease fmease added S-blocked

Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

May 21, 2024

@fmease

@fmease fmease added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

and removed S-blocked

Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work.

labels

May 22, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

May 22, 2024

fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request

May 22, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).

fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request

May 22, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 22, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125406 (Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125406 (Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125165 (Migrate `run-make/pgo-branch-weights` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125224 (Migrate `run-make/issue-53964` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125227 (Migrate `run-make/issue-30063` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125383 (Rewrite `emit`, `mixing-formats` and `bare-outfile` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)
 - rust-lang#125421 (Rewrite `core-no-oom-handling`, `issue-24445` and `issue-38237` `run-make` tests to new `rmake.rs` format)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125224 (Migrate `run-make/issue-53964` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125227 (Migrate `run-make/issue-30063` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125383 (Rewrite `emit`, `mixing-formats` and `bare-outfile` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)
 - rust-lang#125421 (Rewrite `core-no-oom-handling`, `issue-24445` and `issue-38237` `run-make` tests to new `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125438 (Remove unneeded string conversion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124297 (Allow coercing functions whose signature differs in opaque types in their defining scope into a shared function pointer type)
 - rust-lang#124516 (Allow monomorphization time const eval failures if the cause is a type layout issue)
 - rust-lang#124976 (rustc: Use `tcx.used_crates(())` more)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)
 - rust-lang#125421 (Rewrite `core-no-oom-handling`, `issue-24445` and `issue-38237` `run-make` tests to new `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125438 (Remove unneeded string conversion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

@fmease fmease deleted the fix-up-some-diags branch

May 23, 2024 14:53

rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125210 - fmease:fix-up-some-diags, r=davidtwco

Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).