Home Original page

[beta] backports by cuviper · Pull Request #125529 · rust-lang/rust

and others added 4 commits

May 24, 2024 17:31
(cherry picked from commit 827711d)
As discussed at <rust-lang#122106>, use the
crate encoding to represent new primitives.

(cherry picked from commit 809b84e)
…hallow resolvability

(cherry picked from commit fa829fe)
(cherry picked from commit e57f9ac)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

T-libs

Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

May 25, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

May 25, 2024

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 25, 2024 
[beta] backports

- Add `#[inline]` to float `Debug` fallback used by `cfg(no_fp_fmt_parse)` rust-lang#125252
- Add v0 symbol mangling for `f16` and `f128` rust-lang#123816
- Only make GAT ambiguous in `match_projection_projections` considering shallow resolvability rust-lang#125214
- Update to LLVM 18.1.6 rust-lang#125288

r? cuviper

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

and removed S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

labels

May 25, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

May 25, 2024

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request

May 25, 2024 
…acrum

Try to not reinstall tools in mingw CI

Reinstalling the tools seems prone to failure (e.g. [latest](rust-lang#125529 (comment))) and is more work. It also seems unnecessary as CI actually uses a vendored tarball for builds.

cc `@mati865`

jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request

May 26, 2024 
…acrum

Try to not reinstall tools in mingw CI

Reinstalling the tools seems prone to failure (e.g. [latest](rust-lang#125529 (comment))) and is more work. It also seems unnecessary as CI actually uses a vendored tarball for builds.

cc `@mati865`

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 26, 2024 
Try to not reinstall tools in mingw CI

Reinstalling the tools seems prone to failure (e.g. [latest](rust-lang#125529 (comment))) and is more work. It also seems unnecessary as CI actually uses a vendored tarball for builds.

cc `@mati865`

@ojeda ojeda mentioned this pull request

May 26, 2024

67 tasks

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

May 26, 2024 
Try to not reinstall tools in mingw CI

Reinstalling the tools seems prone to failure (e.g. [latest](rust-lang#125529 (comment))) and is more work. It also seems unnecessary as CI actually uses a vendored tarball for builds.

cc `@mati865`

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request

Jun 28, 2024 
Try to not reinstall tools in mingw CI

Reinstalling the tools seems prone to failure (e.g. [latest](rust-lang/rust#125529 (comment))) and is more work. It also seems unnecessary as CI actually uses a vendored tarball for builds.

cc `@mati865`