hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note by jieyouxu · Pull Request #126558 · rust-lang/rust

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

Jun 16, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Jun 18, 2024

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request

Jun 18, 2024
hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note

In rust-lang#122195 I added a "caller chooses ty for type param" note for when the return expression type a.k.a. found type does not match the expected return type.

rust-lang#126547 found that this note was confusing when the found return type *contains* the expected type, e.g.

```rs
fn f<T>(t: &T) -> T {
    t
}
```

because the found return type `&T` will *always* be different from the expected return type `T`, so the note was needlessly redundant and confusing.

This PR addresses that by not making the note if the found return type contains the expected return type.

r? `@fmease` (since you reviewed the original PR)

Fixes rust-lang#126547

This was referenced

Jun 18, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author

Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

and removed S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

labels

Jun 18, 2024
…ram" note

- Avoid "caller chooses ty for type param" note if the found type a.k.a.
  the return expression type *contains* the type parameter, because e.g.
  `&T` will always be different from `T` (i.e. "well duh").
- Rename `note_caller_chooses_ty_for_ty_param` to
  `try_note_caller_chooses_ty_for_ty_param` because the note is not
  always made.

Issue: rust-lang#126547

@jieyouxu

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

Jun 18, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123782 (Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes)
 - rust-lang#124580 (Suggest removing unused tuple fields if they are the last fields)
 - rust-lang#125852 (improve tip for inaccessible traits)
 - rust-lang#126422 (Suggest using a standalone doctest for non-local impl defs)
 - rust-lang#126427 (Rewrite `intrinsic-unreachable`, `sepcomp-cci-copies`, `sepcomp-inlining` and `sepcomp-separate` `run-make` tests to rmake.rs)
 - rust-lang#126493 (safe transmute: support non-ZST, variantful, uninhabited enums)
 - rust-lang#126572 (override user defined channel when using precompiled rustc)
 - rust-lang#126615 (Add `rustc-ice*` to `.gitignore`)
 - rust-lang#126632 (Replace `move||` with `move ||`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#126558 (hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

and removed S-waiting-on-author

Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

labels

Jun 18, 2024

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Jun 18, 2024

jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request

Jun 19, 2024
hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note

In rust-lang#122195 I added a "caller chooses ty for type param" note for when the return expression type a.k.a. found type does not match the expected return type.

rust-lang#126547 found that this note was confusing when the found return type *contains* the expected type, e.g.

```rs
fn f<T>(t: &T) -> T {
    t
}
```

because the found return type `&T` will *always* be different from the expected return type `T`, so the note was needlessly redundant and confusing.

This PR addresses that by not making the note if the found return type contains the expected return type.

r? `@fmease` (since you reviewed the original PR)

Fixes rust-lang#126547

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

Jun 19, 2024
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124135 (delegation: Implement glob delegation)
 - rust-lang#125078 (fix: break inside async closure has incorrect span for enclosing closure)
 - rust-lang#125293 (Place tail expression behind terminating scope)
 - rust-lang#126422 (Suggest using a standalone doctest for non-local impl defs)
 - rust-lang#126493 (safe transmute: support non-ZST, variantful, uninhabited enums)
 - rust-lang#126504 (Sync fuchsia test runner with clang test runner)
 - rust-lang#126558 (hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note)
 - rust-lang#126586 (Add `@badboy` and `@BlackHoleFox` as Mac Catalyst maintainers)
 - rust-lang#126615 (Add `rustc-ice*` to `.gitignore`)
 - rust-lang#126632 (Replace `move||` with `move ||`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

Jun 19, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126558 - jieyouxu:caller-chooses-ty, r=fmease

hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note

In rust-lang#122195 I added a "caller chooses ty for type param" note for when the return expression type a.k.a. found type does not match the expected return type.

rust-lang#126547 found that this note was confusing when the found return type *contains* the expected type, e.g.

```rs
fn f<T>(t: &T) -> T {
    t
}
```

because the found return type `&T` will *always* be different from the expected return type `T`, so the note was needlessly redundant and confusing.

This PR addresses that by not making the note if the found return type contains the expected return type.

r? ``@fmease`` (since you reviewed the original PR)

Fixes rust-lang#126547