Reject SmartPointer constructions not serving the purpose by dingxiangfei2009 · Pull Request #127283 · rust-lang/rust
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
labels
Jul 3, 2024
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.labels
Jul 4, 2024bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Jul 4, 2024…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123043 (Disable dead variant removal for `#[repr(C)]` enums.) - rust-lang#126405 (Migrate some rustc_builtin_macros to SessionDiagnostic) - rust-lang#127037 (Remove some duplicated tests) - rust-lang#127283 (Reject SmartPointer constructions not serving the purpose) - rust-lang#127301 (Tweak some structured suggestions to be more verbose and accurate) - rust-lang#127307 (Allow to have different types for arguments of `Rustc::remap_path_prefix`) - rust-lang#127309 (jsondocck: add `$FILE` built-in variable) - rust-lang#127314 (Trivial update on tidy bless note) - rust-lang#127319 (Remove a use of `StructuredDiag`, which is incompatible with automatic error tainting and error translations) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Jul 4, 2024Rollup merge of rust-lang#127283 - dingxiangfei2009:check-repr-transparent, r=davidtwco Reject SmartPointer constructions not serving the purpose Tracking issue: rust-lang#123430 With this PR we will reject a row of malformed `SmartPointer` implementor candidates. cc `@Darksonn` `@davidtwco` for context.
ojeda
mentioned this pull request
48 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters