…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128206 (Make create_dll_import_lib easier to implement)
 - rust-lang#128424 (minor `effects` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#128527 (More information for fully-qualified suggestion when there are multiple impls)
 - rust-lang#128656 (Enable msvc for run-make/rust-lld)
 - rust-lang#128683 (bootstrap: clear miri's ui test deps when rustc changes)
 - rust-lang#128700 (Migrate `simd-ffi` `run-make` test to rmake)
 - rust-lang#128753 (Don't arbitrarily choose one upper bound for hidden captured region error message)
 - rust-lang#128757 (Migrate `pgo-gen-lto` `run-make` test to rmake)
 - rust-lang#128758 (Specify a minimum supported version for VxWorks)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#128679 (codegen: better centralize function declaration attribute computation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128221 (Add implied target features to target_feature attribute)
 - rust-lang#128261 (impl `Default` for collection iterators that don't already have it)
 - rust-lang#128353 (Change generate-copyright to generate HTML, with cargo dependencies included)
 - rust-lang#128679 (codegen: better centralize function declaration attribute computation)
 - rust-lang#128732 (make `import.vis` is immutable)
 - rust-lang#128755 (Integrate crlf directly into related test file instead via of .gitattributes)
 - rust-lang#128772 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Set architecture for object crate for 32-bit SPARC)
 - rust-lang#128782 (unused_parens: do not lint against parens around &raw)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup merge of rust-lang#128679 - RalfJung:codegen-fn-attrs, r=nikic

codegen: better centralize function declaration attribute computation

For some reason, the codegen backend has two functions that compute which attributes a function declaration gets: `apply_attrs_llfn` and `attributes::from_fn_attrs`. They are called in different places, on entirely different layers of abstraction.

To me the code seems cleaner if we centralize this entirely in `apply_attrs_llfn`, so that's what this PR does.

…n, r=wesleywiser

codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks

Fixes rust-lang#105110.
Fixes rust-lang#105111.

`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.

Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.

…n, r=wesleywiser

codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks

Fixes rust-lang#105110.
Fixes rust-lang#105111.

`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.

Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.

…n, r=wesleywiser

codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks

Fixes rust-lang#105110.
Fixes rust-lang#105111.

`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.

Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.

…n, r=wesleywiser

codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks

Fixes rust-lang#105110.
Fixes rust-lang#105111.

`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.

Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.

Rollup merge of rust-lang#130308 - davidtwco:tied-target-consolidation, r=wesleywiser

codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks

Fixes rust-lang#105110.
Fixes rust-lang#105111.

`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.

Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.

…n, r=wesleywiser

codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks

Fixes rust-lang#105110.
Fixes rust-lang#105111.

`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.

Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.