… r=jieyouxu

Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.

E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](rust-lang/rfcs#2195) was [stabilized](rust-lang#60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout.

This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.

… r=jieyouxu

Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.

E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](rust-lang/rfcs#2195) was [stabilized](rust-lang#60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout.

This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.

…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128795 (Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.)
 - rust-lang#128804 (run-make: enable msvc for redundant-libs)
 - rust-lang#128807 (run-make: run fmt-write-bloat on Windows)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

… r=jieyouxu

Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.

E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](rust-lang/rfcs#2195) was [stabilized](rust-lang#60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout.

This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.

…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128306 (Update NonNull::align_offset quarantees)
 - rust-lang#128612 (Make `validate_mir` ensure the final MIR for all bodies)
 - rust-lang#128648 (Add regression test)
 - rust-lang#128791 (Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn`)
 - rust-lang#128795 (Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.)
 - rust-lang#128825 (rm `declared_features` field in resolver)
 - rust-lang#128826 (Only suggest `#[allow]` for `--warn` and `--deny` lint level flags)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128306 (Update NonNull::align_offset quarantees)
 - rust-lang#128612 (Make `validate_mir` ensure the final MIR for all bodies)
 - rust-lang#128648 (Add regression test)
 - rust-lang#128749 (Mark `{f32,f64}::{next_up,next_down,midpoint}` inline)
 - rust-lang#128795 (Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.)
 - rust-lang#128825 (rm `declared_features` field in resolver)
 - rust-lang#128826 (Only suggest `#[allow]` for `--warn` and `--deny` lint level flags)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup merge of rust-lang#128795 - zachs18:e0517-update-for-rfc-2195, r=jieyouxu

Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.

E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](rust-lang/rfcs#2195) was [stabilized](rust-lang#60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout.

This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.