Do not lint private-in-public for RPITIT by cjgillot · Pull Request #144098 · rust-lang/rust

@cjgillot

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

Jul 17, 2025

@cjgillot

This was referenced

Jul 18, 2025

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-crater

Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed.

labels

Jul 18, 2025

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request

Jul 19, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #141076 (fix Zip unsoundness (again))
 - #142444 (adding run-make test to autodiff)
 - #143704 (Be a bit more careful around exotic cycles in in the inliner)
 - #144073 (Don't test panic=unwind in panic_main.rs on Fuchsia)
 - #144083 (miri sleep tests: increase slack)
 - #144092 (bootstrap: Detect musl hosts)
 - #144098 (Do not lint private-in-public for RPITIT)
 - #144103 (Rename `emit_unless` to `emit_unless_delay`)
 - #144108 (Ignore tests/run-make/link-eh-frame-terminator/rmake.rs when cross-compiling)
 - #144115 (fix outdated comment)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request

Jul 19, 2025
Rollup merge of #144098 - cjgillot:lint-rpitit, r=compiler-errors

Do not lint private-in-public for RPITIT

Fixes the hard error introduced by #143357

Instead of trying to accept this hard error directly, this PR copies tests from #144020 and removes the error.

If the behaviour is actually desirable, the second commit can be reverted with a proper crater run.

cc #143531 for bookkeeping

r? `@compiler-errors`

github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request

Jul 20, 2025

Muscraft pushed a commit to Muscraft/rust that referenced this pull request

Jul 21, 2025
…rrors

Do not lint private-in-public for RPITIT

Fixes the hard error introduced by rust-lang#143357

Instead of trying to accept this hard error directly, this PR copies tests from rust-lang#144020 and removes the error.

If the behaviour is actually desirable, the second commit can be reverted with a proper crater run.

cc rust-lang#143531 for bookkeeping

r? `@compiler-errors`

Muscraft pushed a commit to Muscraft/rust that referenced this pull request

Jul 21, 2025

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

and removed S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

labels

Jul 22, 2025

github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request

Jul 29, 2025

This was referenced

Sep 8, 2025