…ddle

rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`

Context: rust-lang#133073, rust-lang#139224 (TL;DR: `libtest` has soft-deprecated `--nocapture` in favor a new & stable `--no-capture`; we should follow suit).

Since the rustdoc flag is unstable (tracking issue: rust-lang#148116), we're allowed to remove the old flag immediately. However since the flag has existed for 4 years we could hard-deprecate the flag first or at least be considerate and provide a diagnostic referring users to the new flag. This PR does neither. Let me know what you would think would be best.

Cargo doesn't use this flag, not yet at least (rust-lang/cargo#9705), so we really are free to sunset this flag without bigger consequences.

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #148115 (rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`)
 - #148137 (Couple of changes for Redox OS)
 - #148176 ([rustdoc] Include attribute and derive macros when filtering on "macros")
 - #148253 (Handle default features and -Ctarget-features in the dummy backend)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

…ddle

rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`

Context: rust-lang#133073, rust-lang#139224 (TL;DR: `libtest` has soft-deprecated `--nocapture` in favor a new & stable `--no-capture`; we should follow suit).

Since the rustdoc flag is unstable (tracking issue: rust-lang#148116), we're allowed to remove the old flag immediately. However since the flag has existed for 4 years we could hard-deprecate the flag first or at least be considerate and provide a diagnostic referring users to the new flag. This PR does neither. Let me know what you would think would be best.

Cargo doesn't use this flag, not yet at least (rust-lang/cargo#9705), so we really are free to sunset this flag without bigger consequences.

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138217 (Turn `Cow::is_borrowed,is_owned` into associated functions.)
 - #147858 (Micro-optimization attempt in coroutine layout computation)
 - #147923 (Simplify rustc_public context handling)
 - #147935 (Add LLVM realtime sanitizer)
 - #148115 (rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`)
 - #148137 (Couple of changes for Redox OS)
 - #148176 ([rustdoc] Include attribute and derive macros when filtering on "macros")
 - #148193 (Remove `QPath::LangItem`)
 - #148253 (Handle default features and -Ctarget-features in the dummy backend)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138217 (Turn `Cow::is_borrowed,is_owned` into associated functions.)
 - #147858 (Micro-optimization attempt in coroutine layout computation)
 - #147923 (Simplify rustc_public context handling)
 - #148115 (rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`)
 - #148137 (Couple of changes for Redox OS)
 - #148176 ([rustdoc] Include attribute and derive macros when filtering on "macros")
 - #148253 (Handle default features and -Ctarget-features in the dummy backend)
 - #148272 (Align VEX V5 boot routine to 4 bytes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup merge of #148115 - fmease:rustdoc-no-capture, r=notriddle

rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`

Context: #133073, #139224 (TL;DR: `libtest` has soft-deprecated `--nocapture` in favor a new & stable `--no-capture`; we should follow suit).

Since the rustdoc flag is unstable (tracking issue: #148116), we're allowed to remove the old flag immediately. However since the flag has existed for 4 years we could hard-deprecate the flag first or at least be considerate and provide a diagnostic referring users to the new flag. This PR does neither. Let me know what you would think would be best.

Cargo doesn't use this flag, not yet at least (rust-lang/cargo#9705), so we really are free to sunset this flag without bigger consequences.

…ddle

rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`

Context: rust-lang#133073, rust-lang#139224 (TL;DR: `libtest` has soft-deprecated `--nocapture` in favor a new & stable `--no-capture`; we should follow suit).

Since the rustdoc flag is unstable (tracking issue: rust-lang#148116), we're allowed to remove the old flag immediately. However since the flag has existed for 4 years we could hard-deprecate the flag first or at least be considerate and provide a diagnostic referring users to the new flag. This PR does neither. Let me know what you would think would be best.

Cargo doesn't use this flag, not yet at least (rust-lang/cargo#9705), so we really are free to sunset this flag without bigger consequences.

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#138217 (Turn `Cow::is_borrowed,is_owned` into associated functions.)
 - rust-lang#147858 (Micro-optimization attempt in coroutine layout computation)
 - rust-lang#147923 (Simplify rustc_public context handling)
 - rust-lang#148115 (rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`)
 - rust-lang#148137 (Couple of changes for Redox OS)
 - rust-lang#148176 ([rustdoc] Include attribute and derive macros when filtering on "macros")
 - rust-lang#148253 (Handle default features and -Ctarget-features in the dummy backend)
 - rust-lang#148272 (Align VEX V5 boot routine to 4 bytes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

…ddle

rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`

Context: rust-lang#133073, rust-lang#139224 (TL;DR: `libtest` has soft-deprecated `--nocapture` in favor a new & stable `--no-capture`; we should follow suit).

Since the rustdoc flag is unstable (tracking issue: rust-lang#148116), we're allowed to remove the old flag immediately. However since the flag has existed for 4 years we could hard-deprecate the flag first or at least be considerate and provide a diagnostic referring users to the new flag. This PR does neither. Let me know what you would think would be best.

Cargo doesn't use this flag, not yet at least (rust-lang/cargo#9705), so we really are free to sunset this flag without bigger consequences.

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#138217 (Turn `Cow::is_borrowed,is_owned` into associated functions.)
 - rust-lang#147858 (Micro-optimization attempt in coroutine layout computation)
 - rust-lang#147923 (Simplify rustc_public context handling)
 - rust-lang#148115 (rustdoc: Rename unstable option `--nocapture` to `--no-capture` in accordance with `libtest`)
 - rust-lang#148137 (Couple of changes for Redox OS)
 - rust-lang#148176 ([rustdoc] Include attribute and derive macros when filtering on "macros")
 - rust-lang#148253 (Handle default features and -Ctarget-features in the dummy backend)
 - rust-lang#148272 (Align VEX V5 boot routine to 4 bytes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup