add missing s390x target feature to std detect test by folkertdev · Pull Request #148902 · rust-lang/rust
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
labels
Nov 13, 2025
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.labels
Nov 13, 2025Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request
Nov 13, 2025…ture, r=tgross35 add missing s390x target feature to std detect test Fix an oversight from rust-lang#145656, where the `is_s390x_feature_detected!` macro and some target features were stabilized, but other target features remain unstable under a new target feature name. I tested this locally using a `stage1` build on the test file with the `s390x-unknown-linux-gnu` target. cc `@uweigand` r? `@Amanieu` (or whoever really)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request
Nov 14, 2025Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #146978 (Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred) - #148543 (Correctly link to associated trait items in reexports) - #148808 (Some resolve cleanups) - #148812 (coverage: Associate hole spans with expansion tree nodes ) - #148826 (CStr docs: Fix CStr vs &CStr confusion) - #148850 (Implement `Read::read_array`) - #148867 (Refactor `Box::take`) - #148870 (Remove unused LLVMModuleRef argument) - #148878 (error when ABI does not support guaranteed tail calls) - #148901 (Disable rustdoc-test-builder test partially for SGX target.) - #148902 (add missing s390x target feature to std detect test) - #148904 (waffle: stop watching codegen ssa) - #148906 (Expose fmt::Arguments::from_str as unstable.) - #148907 (add assembly test for infinite recursion with `become`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request
Nov 14, 2025…ture, r=tgross35 add missing s390x target feature to std detect test Fix an oversight from rust-lang#145656, where the `is_s390x_feature_detected!` macro and some target features were stabilized, but other target features remain unstable under a new target feature name. I tested this locally using a `stage1` build on the test file with the `s390x-unknown-linux-gnu` target. cc ``@uweigand`` r? ``@Amanieu`` (or whoever really)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request
Nov 14, 2025Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #148543 (Correctly link to associated trait items in reexports) - #148808 (Some resolve cleanups) - #148812 (coverage: Associate hole spans with expansion tree nodes ) - #148826 (CStr docs: Fix CStr vs &CStr confusion) - #148850 (Implement `Read::read_array`) - #148867 (Refactor `Box::take`) - #148870 (Remove unused LLVMModuleRef argument) - #148878 (error when ABI does not support guaranteed tail calls) - #148901 (Disable rustdoc-test-builder test partially for SGX target.) - #148902 (add missing s390x target feature to std detect test) - #148904 (waffle: stop watching codegen ssa) - #148906 (Expose fmt::Arguments::from_str as unstable.) - #148907 (add assembly test for infinite recursion with `become`) - #148928 (Move & adjust some `!`-adjacent tests) - #148929 (ignore `build-rust-analyzer` even if it's a symlink) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request
Nov 14, 2025Rollup merge of #148902 - folkertdev:detect-s390x-target-feature, r=tgross35 add missing s390x target feature to std detect test Fix an oversight from #145656, where the `is_s390x_feature_detected!` macro and some target features were stabilized, but other target features remain unstable under a new target feature name. I tested this locally using a `stage1` build on the test file with the `s390x-unknown-linux-gnu` target. cc ```@uweigand``` r? ```@Amanieu``` (or whoever really)
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request
Nov 30, 2025…ture, r=tgross35 add missing s390x target feature to std detect test Fix an oversight from rust-lang#145656, where the `is_s390x_feature_detected!` macro and some target features were stabilized, but other target features remain unstable under a new target feature name. I tested this locally using a `stage1` build on the test file with the `s390x-unknown-linux-gnu` target. cc ```@uweigand``` r? ```@Amanieu``` (or whoever really)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters