[std] Osstr len clarity by jnqnfe · Pull Request #56141 · rust-lang/rust
added 2 commits
November 21, 2018 18:30label
Nov 26, 2018
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.labels
Dec 2, 2018bors added a commit that referenced this pull request
Dec 3, 2018Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #56141 ([std] Osstr len clarity) - #56366 (Stabilize self_in_typedefs feature) - #56395 (Stabilize dbg!(...)) - #56401 (Move VecDeque::resize_with out of the impl<T:Clone> block) - #56402 (Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait) - #56412 (Update tracking issue for `extern_crate_self`) - #56416 (Remove unneeded body class selector) - #56418 (Fix failing tidy (line endings on Windows)) - #56419 (Remove some uses of try!) - #56432 (Update issue number of `shrink_to` methods to point the tracking issue) - #56433 (Add description about `crate` for parse_visibility's comment) - #56435 (make the C part of compiler-builtins opt-out) - #56438 (Remove not used `DotEq` token) Failed merges: r? @ghost
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request
Dec 7, 2021…Mark-Simulacrum Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string Fixes rust-lang#53261 Since that issue was filed, rust-lang#56141 added a further clarification to the `OsString` docs. However the ffi docs may still leave the impression that an `OsStr` is in the platform native form. This PR aims to further emphasise that an `OsStr` is not necessarily a platform string.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request
Dec 8, 2021…Mark-Simulacrum Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string Fixes rust-lang#53261 Since that issue was filed, rust-lang#56141 added a further clarification to the `OsString` docs. However the ffi docs may still leave the impression that an `OsStr` is in the platform native form. This PR aims to further emphasise that an `OsStr` is not necessarily a platform string.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request
Dec 8, 2021…Mark-Simulacrum Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string Fixes rust-lang#53261 Since that issue was filed, rust-lang#56141 added a further clarification to the `OsString` docs. However the ffi docs may still leave the impression that an `OsStr` is in the platform native form. This PR aims to further emphasise that an `OsStr` is not necessarily a platform string.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters