Fix #88256 remove duplicated diagnostics by chenyukang · Pull Request #88493 · rust-lang/rust
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.labels
Sep 5, 2021calebcartwright pushed a commit to calebcartwright/rust that referenced this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
nnethercote added a commit to nnethercote/rust that referenced this pull request
Jan 30, 2024
`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.
nnethercote added a commit to nnethercote/rust that referenced this pull request
Jan 30, 2024
`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.
Nadrieril added a commit to Nadrieril/rust that referenced this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…estebank Don't hash lints differently to non-lints. `Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar. r? `@estebank`
Nadrieril added a commit to Nadrieril/rust that referenced this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…estebank Don't hash lints differently to non-lints. `Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar. r? `@estebank`
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120490 - nnethercote:Diagnostic-hashing, r=estebank Don't hash lints differently to non-lints. `Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar. r? `@estebank`
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
…estebank Don't hash lints differently to non-lints. `Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more. This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9 | LL | impl T1 for S {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` and with this change we also get this error: ``` error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13 | LL | fn foo() {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | note: existing `foo` defined here --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9 | LL | impl T2 for S {} | ``` I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar. r? `@estebank`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters