Implement --check-cfg option (RFC 3013), take 2 by Urgau · Pull Request #93915 · rust-lang/rust

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler

Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

T-rustdoc

Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

labels

Feb 11, 2022

fbstj

fbstj

fbstj

@lcnr lcnr mentioned this pull request

Feb 14, 2022

petrochenkov

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

and removed S-waiting-on-author

Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

labels

Feb 15, 2022

petrochenkov

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

and removed S-waiting-on-author

Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

labels

Feb 16, 2022

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author

Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

and removed T-rustdoc

Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Feb 16, 2022

@Urgau @wanda-phi

Co-authored-by: Urgau <lolo.branstett@numericable.fr>
Co-authored-by: Marcelina Kościelnicka <mwk@0x04.net>

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author

Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

label

Feb 16, 2022

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors

Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

and removed S-waiting-on-review

Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

labels

Feb 16, 2022

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request

Feb 19, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89892 (Suggest `impl Trait` return type when incorrectly using a generic return type)
 - rust-lang#91675 (Add MemTagSanitizer Support)
 - rust-lang#92806 (Add more information to `impl Trait` error)
 - rust-lang#93497 (Pass `--test` flag through rustdoc to rustc so `#[test]` functions can be scraped)
 - rust-lang#93814 (mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: correct soft-foat)
 - rust-lang#93847 (kmc-solid: Use the filesystem thread-safety wrapper)
 - rust-lang#93877 (asm: Allow the use of r8-r14 as clobbers on Thumb1)
 - rust-lang#93892 (Only mark projection as ambiguous if GAT substs are constrained)
 - rust-lang#93915 (Implement --check-cfg option (RFC 3013), take 2)
 - rust-lang#93953 (Add the `known-bug` test directive, use it, and do some cleanup)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

This was referenced

Feb 19, 2022

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request

Feb 25, 2022
…eGomez

Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc

This pull-request wire up the new unstable `--check-cfg` option from `rustc` to `rustdoc` as [requested](rust-lang#93915 (comment)) in the [pull-request](rust-lang#93915) that introduce `--check-cfg`.

The motivation was describe in the original PR by `@jyn514` who wrote rust-lang#89346 (comment):
> > add plumbing to pass --check-cfg from rustdoc (do we want this one?)
>
> It would be useful, I think, it catches issues like cfg(doctst) or something (and in general I would like expansion to match rustc as closely as possible).

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request

Feb 25, 2022
…eGomez

Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc

This pull-request wire up the new unstable `--check-cfg` option from `rustc` to `rustdoc` as [requested](rust-lang#93915 (comment)) in the [pull-request](rust-lang#93915) that introduce `--check-cfg`.

The motivation was describe in the original PR by ``@jyn514`` who wrote rust-lang#89346 (comment):
> > add plumbing to pass --check-cfg from rustdoc (do we want this one?)
>
> It would be useful, I think, it catches issues like cfg(doctst) or something (and in general I would like expansion to match rustc as closely as possible).

@Urgau Urgau deleted the rfc-3013 branch

May 5, 2023 16:47