chore(deps): bump go.opentelemetry.io/otel from v1.36.0 to v1.37.0 by vm-001 · Pull Request #195 · webhookx-io/webhookx
Navigation Menu
{{ message }}
webhookx-io / webhookx Public
- Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
- Fork 16
Comments
Merged
chore(deps): bump go.opentelemetry.io/otel from v1.36.0 to v1.37.0#195
webhookx-x merged 2 commits intomainfrom
chore(deps): bump go.opentelemetry.io/otel from v1.36.0 to v1.37.0#195
webhookx-x merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Copy link
Collaborator
Note
This PR bumps go.opentelemetry.io/otel from v1.36.0 to v1.37.0 and introduces a breaking change regarding HTTP metric names, unless the environment variable OTEL_SEMCONV_STABILITY_OPT_IN is set.
For example
http.method → http.request.method
See https://opentelemetry.io/blog/2023/http-conventions-declared-stable/#summary-of-changes
Copy link
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| integration | ? |
|
| unit | 11.69% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 108 files with indirect coverage changes
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
- ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
webhookx-x
force-pushed
the
deps/otel
branch
from
b095837 to
f81e2d1
Compare
vm-001
force-pushed
the
deps/otel
branch
2 times, most recently
from
034910e to
6173c43
Compare
webhookx-x
force-pushed
the
deps/otel
branch
from
6173c43 to
2b4c9b8
Compare
webhookx-x
force-pushed
the
deps/otel
branch
from
2b4c9b8 to
8d63377
Compare
vm-001
force-pushed
the
deps/otel
branch
from
d1bac41 to
6e12a59
Compare
webhookx-x approved these changes Jul 28, 2025
webhookx-x
deleted the
deps/otel
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants