Re: Quitting debian-java
- To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
- Cc: Alan KF LAU <akflau@itsd.gcn.gov.hk>, bortzmeyer@debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Quitting debian-java
- From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:01:48 -0800 (PST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0103012200180.25699-100000@cornerstone.core.aoi>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] m266hsbw14.fsf@kelso.bothner.com>
Per, I'm guessing this guy is one of those who thinks the only thing that can be done with Java is a Web application (which, presumably, makes heavy use of java.security.*). I think we should come up with a name for people like that. Dot-communists? Dot-com-a-holics? Dot-com-iacs? ;) Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++(++++)>$ UL++++>$ P--- L++>++$ E+ W+(-) N+ o? K? w---() !O !M !V PS+(++)>+ PE-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI(+) D++ G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ On 1 Mar 2001, Per Bothner wrote: > Alan KF LAU <akflau@itsd.gcn.gov.hk> writes: > > > Just for everybody's information. kaffe is in fact developed under a contract to Microsoft, please see http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,20225,00.html > > This quite misleading. As far as I know, the Microsoft contract > referred to has only funded a very small part of Kaffe. (I have had > contact with Tim Wilkinson and Kaffe since before there was a > Transvirtual, and in fact was involved in some early of funding of > Kaffe, when I worked at Cygnus .) > > > Also one of the very annoying thing in kaffe bother me much is that it has not implemented java.security. It is a mistake or an intention to make Java insecure? > > See http://www.kaffe.org/cgi-bin/kaffe/security?user=guest;addsignature=1 > > > > How could one build a serious application without java.security? > > You are being deliberately provocative. Of course one can build a > serious application without java.security. One can even build a > secure application without it, though java.security gives you better > control. A compiler, a word-processor, an editor, or any single-user > application should not to deal with security concerns. > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org >
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quitting debian-java
- From: Alan KF LAU <akflau@itsd.gcn.gov.hk>
- Re: Quitting debian-java
- References:
- Re: Quitting debian-java
- From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
- Re: Quitting debian-java
- Prev by Date: Re: Quitting debian-java
- Next by Date: Free replacements for non-free software (Re: Quitting debian-java)
- Previous by thread: Re: Quitting debian-java
- Next by thread: Re: Quitting debian-java
- Index(es):