---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

---

• To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Cc: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>, "John R. Daily" <jdaily@progeny.com>
• Subject: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
• Date: 15 Jan 2002 17:55:42 +0100
• Message-id: <[🔎] 87advfd04x.fsf@orcus.priv.at>
• In-reply-to: <20011219202405.5842D1C1C9@minerva.progeny.com>
• References: <20011212193422.A43041C186@minerva.progeny.com> <1008790242.13391.40.camel@sarge> <20011219202405.5842D1C1C9@minerva.progeny.com>

---

What become of the effort of getting kaffe into woody?

"John R. Daily" <jdaily@progeny.com> writes:

> From a broader perspective, the age of 1.0.6 would seem to
> militate for a CVS snapshot, and I suspect that individuals
> looking for support for kaffe would have no more difficult a time
> getting it for a CVS version than for 1.0.6.

Using a CVS snapshot seems like the smaller evil. Most people really
using kaffe seem to rely on something more recent than 1.0.6.

-- 
Robbe

Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature

---

Reply to:

• debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Robert Bihlmeyer (on-list)
• Robert Bihlmeyer (off-list)

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Kaffe porting issues
    • From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>

• Prev by Date: AccessControlException
• Next by Date: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• Previous by thread: AccessControlException
• Next by thread: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread