Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- To: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>
- Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 03:25:16 +1100
- Message-id: <20030122032516.A9691@ms.unimelb.edu.au>
- In-reply-to: <20030121161142.9720.qmail@web10003.mail.yahoo.com>; from robilad@yahoo.com on Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:11:42AM -0800
- References: <20030122022054.A9369@ms.unimelb.edu.au> <20030121161142.9720.qmail@web10003.mail.yahoo.com>
> I'd like to point out that I wasn't advocating that > the debian maintainer tracks all VMs available for > debian all the time. Just that she specifies a (i.e. > at least one ;) free VM that the application works > with in order to be in 'debian-free'. Mm.. what worries me about this is that if I (say) choose Kaffe as my working JVM and my package has Depends: kaffe, then all other users are forced to install kaffe even if my package happens to work on most or all other JVMs. Perhaps Depends: kaffe | java1-runtime to show the user that I know it works on kaffe but to allow a user to install some other JVM instead? b.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>
- Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- References:
- Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
- Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>
- Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- Prev by Date: Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- Next by Date: Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- Previous by thread: Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- Next by thread: Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime
- Index(es):